Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Implantation of Human-Sized Coronary Stents into Rat Abdominal Aorta Using a Trans-Femoral Access
Published on: November 19, 2020
Bare-metal stent versus drug-eluting stent in large coronary arteries: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Deng-Feng Geng1, Zhe Meng, Hai-Yan Yan
1Department of Cardiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Insights
Drug-eluting stents (DES) show superiority over bare-metal stents (BMS) in reducing adverse cardiac events in large coronary arteries during mid-term follow-up. Long-term efficacy requires further study.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in large coronary arteries remains uncertain.
- Large coronary arteries present unique challenges for stent implantation and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical efficacy of DES versus BMS in large coronary vessels (≥3.0 mm).
- To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating DES vs. BMS in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Meta-analysis of six relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- Inclusion of 4,399 patients with large coronary arteries (reference vessel diameter ≥3.0 mm).
- Assessment of clinical events including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target vessel revascularization (TVR).
Main Results:
- No significant differences in cardiac death/MI, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis between DES and BMS.
- DES significantly reduced the risk of target vessel revascularization (TVR) compared to BMS [Hazard Ratio: 0.48 (0.33, 0.70)].
- Benefits of DES for TVR were consistent across various patient subgroups and stent generations, with no significant differences at ≥3-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Drug-eluting stents (DES) demonstrate superior mid-term efficacy over bare-metal stents (BMS) in reducing adverse cardiac events in large coronary arteries.
- Further research is warranted to evaluate the long-term efficacy of newer-generation DES compared to BMS in larger coronary arteries.
Background:
Uncertainties exist with regard to the efficacy of drug-eluting stent (DES) versus bare-metal stent (BMS) in large coronary arteries.
Objective And Methods:
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of BMS versus DES in terms of clinical events in large coronary vessels (≥3.0 mm) by performing a meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Results:
Six RCTs with 4,399 patients were included in this study. Overall, there were no significant between-group differences in the risks of the composite of cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (cardiac death/MI), cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, however, DES was associated with significant reduction in the risk of target vessel revascularization (TVR) compared with BMS [0.48 (0.33, 0.70)] with consistent benefits among patients with reference vessel diameter ≥ 3.5 mm, reference vessel diameter ≥ 4.0 mm, stent length ≤ 15 mm, first-generation DES or second-generation DES. In patients with ≥ 3-year follow-up, there were no significant between-group differences in the risk of cardiac death/MI, TVR, cardiac death, myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis.
Conclusions:
This meta-analysis suggests that DES is superior to BMS in terms of adverse cardiac events in large coronary arteries at the mid-term follow-up. The long-term efficacy of newer-generation DES versus BMS in larger coronary arteries is still worth further evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Angina IV: Management
