Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

11:21
Development of a Novel Internal Fixation Model for Rat Radial Fractures: Fracture Healing Assessment and Dorsal Root Ganglion Isolation
Published on: March 13, 2026
Routine pin tract care in external fixation is unnecessary: a randomised, prospective, blinded controlled study
Carlo Camathias1, Victor Valderrabano, Hermann Oberli
1UKBB, University Childrens Hospital Basel, Department of Orthopaedics, Spitalstrasse 33, 4056 Basel, Switzerland. carlo.camathias@ukbb.ch
Injury
|August 21, 2012
Summary
Routine pin tract care is not necessary for external fixation (ExFix) treatment. This study found no significant difference in infection rates or pin stability between daily care and no care groups, simplifying ExFix management.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Infectious Disease Prevention
Background:
- Pin site infections are a common complication (up to 40%) of external fixator (ExFix) devices.
- Current literature lacks consensus on optimal pin tract care protocols for infection prevention.
- This study introduces the first intra-subject, randomized, prospective controlled trial on ExFix pin site care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of daily pin tract care versus no pin tract care in preventing complications associated with external fixators.
- To evaluate the impact of pin tract care on soft-tissue interface, pin stability, osteolysis, and pain.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, intra-subject, randomized controlled trial involving 56 patients (204 pins) at a national referral hospital.
- Pins were randomized to either daily pin site care (101 pins) or no treatment (103 pins).
- Outcomes including soft-tissue interface, pin stability, osteolysis, and pain were assessed blindly. Torque was measured to assess stability.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were observed between the daily care and no care groups for any assessed outcome.
- Soft-tissue interface issues (granulation/secretion) were similar (36% vs. 35%).
- Pin loosening, osteolysis, and torque measurements showed no significant variations between groups.
Conclusions:
- Routine pin tract care is unnecessary for patients undergoing external fixation treatment.
- Simplifying pin site management protocols can potentially reduce patient burden without compromising treatment outcomes.

