Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

10:26
RNAscope for In situ Detection of Transcriptionally Active Human Papillomavirus in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: March 11, 2014
Practice patterns in cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus testing.
Armanda D Tatsas1, Darcy F Phelan, Patti E Gravitt
1Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. atatsas1@jhmi.edu
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|August 21, 2012
Summary
Cervical cancer screening using human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing plus Papanicolaou (Pap) testing (cotesting) increased significantly in women aged 30+ from 2008-2010. However, age-inappropriate cotesting persisted in younger women.
Area of Science:
- Gynecology
- Oncology
- Public Health
Background:
- Since 2006, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing plus Papanicolaou (Pap) testing (cotesting) has been recommended for cervical cancer screening in women aged 30 and older.
- Limited data exist on the clinical practice adoption of this recommended cotesting strategy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze trends in the monthly percentage of Pap tests ordered as cotests in a clinical laboratory setting over a 2.5-year period.
- To identify changes in the average monthly proportion of cotests using joinpoint regression analysis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of laboratory testing data from January 2008 to June 2010.
- Joinpoint regression analysis to determine statistically significant changes in cotesting trends.
Main Results:
- Cotesting in patients aged 30 years and older increased from 15.9% in January 2008 to 39.4% in June 2010.
- In patients aged 18 to 29 years, cotesting initially increased but then trended downward, ending at 7.7% in June 2010.
- The study observed increased adoption of age-appropriate cotesting alongside persistent age-inappropriate cotesting.
Conclusions:
- Clinical practice shows increasing adherence to age-recommended cotesting guidelines for cervical cancer screening.
- Continued vigilance is needed to address and reduce the persistence of age-inappropriate cotesting in younger age groups.
