Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting01:26

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

Focus Charting, also known as the focus charting system or "focus documentation," is a systematic documentation approach used in healthcare to organize patient information in medical records.
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pharmacological inhibition of hydroxysteroid 11-beta dehydrogenase type 1 (11-βHSD1) after myocardial infarction preserves cardiac function in a translational mini-pig model.

British journal of pharmacology·2025
Same author

IL-33 is associated with alveolar dysfunction in patients with viral lower respiratory tract disease.

Mucosal immunology·2024
Same author

Computer Adaptive vs. Non-adaptive Medical Progress Testing: Feasibility, Test Performance, and Student Experiences.

Perspectives on medical education·2024
Same author

Inhibition of the glucocorticoid-activating enzyme 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 drives concurrent 11-oxygenated androgen excess.

FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology·2024
Same author

Composite Reliability of Workplace Based Assessment of International Medical Graduates.

MedEdPublish (2016)·2024
Same author

Reliability, validity and acceptability of an online clinical reasoning simulator for medical students: An international pilot.

Medical teacher·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

A systemic framework for the progress test: strengths, constraints and issues: AMEE Guide No. 71.

William Wrigley1, Cees P M van der Vleuten, Adrian Freeman

  • 1Department of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

Medical Teacher
|August 22, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This guide offers a framework to enhance the quality and reliability of progress testing in medical education. It addresses challenges in multiple-choice tests to improve learning and teaching standards.

More Related Videos

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Assessment in Health Professions Education

Background:

  • Progress testing is increasingly utilized in medical education for diverse assessment needs.
  • Multiple-choice tests, commonly used in progress testing, face challenges regarding validity and reliability due to error variance.
  • Existing progress testing programs require systematic frameworks for quality improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a generic, systemic framework for improving the quality and defensibility of progress test data.
  • To guide the establishment and enhancement of progress testing programs in medical education.
  • To embed progress testing as a quality-controlled tool for learning, teaching, and demonstrating educational standards.

Main Methods:

  • The framework is developed from the collective experience of a Dutch consortium and a UK medical school.
  • It synthesizes findings from extensive progress test literature.
  • The approach focuses on identifying and exploring improvements in test data quality.

Main Results:

  • The framework provides a structured approach to address the inherent challenges in progress testing.
  • It highlights the strengths and constraints of progress testing methodologies.
  • The guide offers actionable insights for refining existing programs and establishing new ones.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing this framework can enhance the validity and reliability of progress testing in medical education.
  • Systematic quality control of progress testing supports improved learning outcomes and teaching effectiveness.
  • The framework serves as a valuable resource for medical education programs seeking to optimize their assessment strategies.