Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

High-Temperature and High-Pressure In situ Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Published on: October 9, 2020
Chemical/physical pressure tunable spin-transition temperature and hysteresis in a two-step spin crossover porous
Jian-Bin Lin1, Wei Xue, Bao-Ying Wang
1MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinorganic and Synthetic Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.
Abstract:
A two-dimensional (2D) square-grid type porous coordination polymer [Fe(bdpt)(2)]·guest (1·g, Hbdpt = 3-(5-bromo-2-pyridyl)-5-(4-pyridyl)-1,2,4-triazole) with isolated small cavities was designed and constructed as a spin-crossover (SCO) material based on octahedral Fe(II)N(6) units and an all-nitrogen ligand. Three guest-inclusion forms were successfully prepared for 1·g (1·EtOH for g = ethanol, 1·MeOH for g = methanol, 1 for g = Null), in which the guest molecules interact with the framework as hydrogen-bonding donors. Magnetic susceptibility measurements showed that 1·g exhibited two-step SCO behavior with different transition temperatures (1·EtOH < 1·MeOH < 1) and hysteresis widths (1·EtOH > 1·MeOH > 1 ≈ 0). Such guest modulation of two-step spin crossover temperature and hysteresis without changing two-step state in a porous coordination framework is unprecedented. X-ray single-crystal structural analyses revealed that all two-step SCO processes were accompanied with interesting symmetry-breaking phase transitions from space group of P2(1)/n for all high-spin Fe(II), to P1 for ordered half high-spin and half low-spin Fe(II), and back to P2(1)/n for all low-spin Fe(II) again by lowering temperature. The different SCO behaviors of 1·g were elucidated by the steric mechanism and guest-host hydrogen-bonding interactions. The SCO behavior of 1·g can be also controlled by external physical pressure.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Valence Bond Theory
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...

