Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026
Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry
Published on: June 6, 2025
Dental composite restorations and neuropsychological development in children: treatment level analysis from a
Nancy N Maserejian1, Felicia L Trachtenberg, Russ Hauser
1New England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA 02472, USA. nmaserejian@neriscience.com
Background:
Resin-based dental restorations may intra-orally release their components and bisphenol A. Gestational bisphenol A exposure has been associated with poorer executive functioning in children.
Objectives:
To examine whether exposure to resin-based composite restorations is associated with neuropsychological development in children.
Methods:
Secondary analysis of treatment level data from the New England Children's Amalgam Trial, a 2-group randomized safety trial conducted from 1997 to 2006. Children (N=534) aged 6-10 y with ≥2 posterior tooth caries were randomized to treatment with amalgam or resin-based composites (bisphenol-A-diglycidyl-dimethacrylate-composite for permanent teeth; urethane dimethacrylate-based polyacid-modified compomer for primary teeth). Neuropsychological function at 4- and 5-year follow-up (N=444) was measured by a battery of tests of executive function, intelligence, memory, visual-spatial skills, verbal fluency, and problem-solving. Multivariable generalized linear regression models were used to examine the association between composite exposure levels and changes in neuropsychological test scores from baseline to follow-up. For comparison, data on children randomized to amalgam treatment were similarly analyzed.
Results:
With greater exposure to either dental composite material, results were generally consistent in the direction of slightly poorer changes in tests of intelligence, achievement or memory, but there were no statistically significant associations. For the four primary measures of executive function, scores were slightly worse with greater total composite exposure, but statistically significant only for the test of Letter Fluency (10-surface-years β=-0.8, SE=0.4, P=0.035), and the subtest of color naming (β=-1.5, SE=0.5, P=0.004) in the Stroop Color-Word Interference Test. Multivariate analysis of variance confirmed that the negative associations between composite level and executive function were not statistically significant (MANOVA, P=0.18). Results for greater amalgam exposure were mostly nonsignificant in the opposite direction of slightly improved scores over follow-up.
Conclusions:
Dental composite restorations had statistically insignificant associations of small magnitude with impairments in neuropsychological test change scores over 4- or 5-years of follow-up in this trial.
