Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CRISPR-Based Assay for Point-of-Care Pharmacogenetic CYP2C19 Genotyping.

ACS sensors·2026
Same author

Methemoglobin Formation Reflects Systemic Nitric Oxide Uptake: The Critical Role of Delivery Method-Results from Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2026
Same author

Evaluating prognostic performance for acute delta changes of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in emergency department patients.

Clinical biochemistry·2026
Same author

Minimally invasive implantation of scalable high-density cortical microelectrode arrays for multimodal neural decoding and stimulation.

Nature biomedical engineering·2025
Same author

BinaxNOW vs malaria: A diagnostic showdown: Design and implementation of a verification strategy across 4 academic hospitals in an area with low malaria prevalence.

American journal of clinical pathology·2025
Same author

Electronic tools to improve procalcitonin utilization.

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE·2025
Same journal

Invasive urothelial carcinoma in association with surface low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma: clinical and pathologic insights from a rare entity.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

CEACAM1 expression by immunohistochemistry in B-cell lymphomas and plasma cell myeloma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive multicriteria life cycle assessment of biopsy processing in a surgical pathology department.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic significance of Myb protein and its downstream target genes in lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Mismatch repair protein "nonclassic expression loss" pattern in colorectal cancer: an important staining pattern that is not well understood.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal pain in medical laboratory personnel: a cross-sectional study.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

Detection of preanalytic laboratory testing errors using a statistically guided protocol.

Jason M Baron1, Craig H Mermel, Kent B Lewandrowski

  • 1Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|August 23, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Laboratories can now detect false high glucose readings using statistical models and clinical judgment. This protocol improves identification of phlebotomy errors, ensuring more accurate patient results.

More Related Videos

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
12:08

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital

Published on: June 11, 2012

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
12:08

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital

Published on: June 11, 2012

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Laboratory Science
  • Medical Informatics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Preanalytic errors in laboratory testing are challenging to detect.
  • Accurate laboratory results are crucial for patient diagnosis and treatment.
  • Phlebotomy errors, such as improper line draws, can lead to spurious laboratory values.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and implement a protocol for identifying spuriously elevated glucose results.
  • To integrate statistical models with clinical judgment for preanalytic error detection.
  • To improve the laboratory's ability to identify and manage phlebotomy-related errors.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a decision tree-generating algorithm with annotated training data.
  • Developed classification criteria to distinguish between real and spurious critically elevated glucose results.
  • Incorporated patient-specific average glucose and anion gap values into the decision tree model.

Main Results:

  • Decision trees identified specific parameters indicative of spurious glucose results: a 30-day patient-specific average glucose < 186.3 mg/dL, a current glucose > 663 mg/dL, and an anion gap < 16.5 mEq/L.
  • Implementation of the protocol significantly enhanced the laboratory's identification of spurious glucose values.
  • The developed protocol demonstrated effectiveness in improving error detection rates.

Conclusions:

  • Statistical models and clinical judgment can be effectively combined to create protocols for preanalytic error detection.
  • The developed decision tree-based protocol successfully identified spurious glucose results due to phlebotomy errors.
  • This approach offers a valuable tool for improving laboratory quality and may be applicable to detecting other types of errors.