Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breast cancer genomic subtype-specific copy number alterations in metastases.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Real-time cell viability monitoring for high-throughput drug screening using tumor xenograft-derived cells.

Cell reports methods·2026
Same author

AI-predicted spatial transcriptomics unlocks breast cancer biomarkers from pathology.

Cell·2026
Same author

A multi-ancestry genome-wide study of tamoxifen metabolism and breast cancer recurrence.

NPJ breast cancer·2026
Same author

Compartment-specific tumor-infiltrating immune cells and prognosis in breast cancer.

iScience·2026
Same author

PI3K Inhibition in Combination with Tamoxifen in Patients with Metastatic HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: Clinical and Circulating Tumor DNA Results.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Calling sample mix-ups in cancer population studies.

Andy G Lynch1, Suet-Feung Chin, Mark J Dunning

  • 1Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.

Plos One
|August 23, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) can detect sample tracking errors in large genomics studies. However, applying this to cancer studies with historical samples requires careful consideration of tumor characteristics and population structure.

More Related Videos

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing
11:02

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing

Published on: October 18, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing
11:02

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing

Published on: October 18, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Sample tracking errors are a persistent challenge in large-scale experiments.
  • Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) have emerged as a method to detect sample mix-ups in population genomics.
  • The METABRIC project, a large breast cancer study, utilized an eQTL-based approach for quality assurance during the study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility and challenges of eQTL-based sample mix-up detection in large cancer studies, particularly those using historical samples.
  • To identify specific factors complicating eQTL analysis in cancer cohorts.
  • To provide insights for experimental design in similar future studies.

Main Methods:

  • Application of an eQTL-based approach (termed 'BADGER') to identify sample tracking errors within the METABRIC breast cancer dataset.
  • Analysis of factors influencing eQTL interpretation, including tumor sample usage, cellularity, RNA quality, population substructure, and family structures.
  • Evaluation of experimental design considerations for robust eQTL-based quality assurance.

Main Results:

  • The eQTL-based method was successfully applied to the METABRIC project for real-time quality assurance.
  • Specific challenges were identified, including the use of tumor samples, variable cellularity, RNA degradation, population stratification, and familial relatedness.
  • The study provides data and considerations for optimizing the design of future large-scale cancer genomics studies.

Conclusions:

  • eQTL-based detection of sample tracking errors is a valuable tool for large genomics studies, including cancer research.
  • Implementation requires careful attention to specific challenges inherent in cancer studies with historical samples.
  • Optimized experimental design and careful interpretation are crucial for the effective use of this quality assurance method.