Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

10:34
Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
Published on: December 9, 2022
Quantitative dimethyl sulfate mapping for automated RNA secondary structure inference
Pablo Cordero1, Wipapat Kladwang, Christopher C VanLang
1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Biochemistry
|August 24, 2012
Summary
Dimethyl sulfate (DMS) mapping now aids automated RNA secondary structure modeling. This routine technique provides accurate, unbiased RNA structure predictions comparable to existing methods.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Dimethyl sulfate (DMS) mapping is a long-established technique for RNA structure analysis.
- Manual modeling of RNA secondary structure has traditionally relied on DMS mapping data.
- Automated RNA structure prediction methods are increasingly important for biological research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To integrate dimethyl sulfate (DMS) mapping data into an automated RNA secondary structure inference framework.
- To evaluate the performance of DMS-guided RNA structure modeling compared to existing methods like SHAPE.
- To establish DMS mapping as a quantitative tool for unbiased RNA secondary structure modeling.
Main Methods:
- Incorporation of DMS reactivity data into an energy minimization framework.
- Development of automated secondary structure inference algorithms.
- Validation using six noncoding RNAs with known crystallographic structures.
- Application of bootstrapping for confidence estimation in structural predictions.
Main Results:
- DMS-guided automated modeling achieved low false negative (9.5%) and false discovery (11.6%) rates.
- Performance was comparable or superior to SHAPE-guided modeling for RNA secondary structure prediction.
- Integration of DMS-SHAPE and CMCT reactivities offered minor improvements in accuracy.
- Bootstrapping provided reliable confidence estimates for the predicted RNA structures.
Conclusions:
- Dimethyl sulfate (DMS) mapping can be effectively utilized for automated, quantitative RNA secondary structure modeling.
- The developed framework offers an unbiased approach to RNA structure prediction.
- DMS mapping is a valuable addition to the toolkit for RNA structure biologists, enhancing routine analysis.
