Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
An exploratory analysis of the model for understanding success in quality
Heather C Kaplan1, Craig M Froehle, Amy Cassedy
1Heather C. Kaplan, MD, MSCE, is Assistant Professor, Perinatal Institute, James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio. E-mail: heather.kaplan@cchmc.org. Craig M. Froehle, PhD, MBA, is Associate Professor, Carl H. Lindner College of Business, University of Cincinnati; James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio. Amy Cassedy, PhD, is Research Associate, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center,Ohio. Lloyd P. Provost, MS, is Consultant, Associates in Process Improvement, Austin, Texas. Peter A. Margolis, MD, PhD, is Professor, James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical, Ohio.
Background:
Experience suggests that differences in context produce variability in the effectiveness of quality improvement (QI) interventions. However, little is known about which contextual factors affect success or how they exert influence.
Purpose:
Using the Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ), we perform exploratory quantitative tests of the role of context in QI success.
Methodology:
We used a cross-sectional design to survey individuals participating in QI projects in three settings: a pediatric hospital, hospitals affiliated with a state QI collaborative, and organizations sponsoring participants in an improvement advisor training program. Individuals participating in QI projects completed a questionnaire assessing contextual factors included in MUSIQ and measures of perceived success. Path analysis was used to test the direct, indirect, and total effects of context variables on QI success as hypothesized in MUSIQ.
Findings:
In the 74 projects studied, most contextual factors in MUSIQ were found to be significantly related to at least one QI project performance outcome. Contextual factors exhibiting significant effects on two measures of perceived QI success included resource availability, QI team leadership, team QI skills, microsystem motivation, microsystem QI culture, and microsystem QI capability. There was weaker evidence for effects of senior leader project sponsors, organizational QI culture, QI team decision-making, and microsystem QI leadership. These initial tests add to the validity of MUSIQ as a tool for identifying which contextual factors affect improvement success and understanding how they exert influence.
Practice Implications:
Using MUSIQ, managers and QI practitioners can begin to identify aspects of context that must be addressed before or during the execution of QI projects and plan strategies to modify context for increased success. Additional work by QI researchers to improve the theory, refine measurement approaches, and validate MUSIQ as a predictive tool in a wider range of QI efforts is necessary.
More Related Videos
05:47Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
Published on: August 29, 2025
20:24Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
Published on: January 31, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Significance Testing: Overview
Introduction to Statistical Process Control