Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions01:19

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...
Egoism and Altruism01:55

Egoism and Altruism

Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
Cognitivism01:17

Cognitivism

Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory01:20

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systematic review and meta-analysis of acute hypoxia and cognition: Domain-specific effects and the role of barometric pressure and carbon dioxide.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

'That's just weird': A qualitative investigation into expert opinions on the difference between autonomous vehicles and humans deciding to kill.

PloS one·2025
Same author

"All things equal": ethical principles governing why autonomous vehicle experts change or retain their opinions in trolley problems-a qualitative study.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2025
Same author

Ethical collection of animal cadavers for veterinary education.

BMC veterinary research·2025
Same author

Correction: Recovery from acute hypoxia: A systematic review of cognitive and physiological responses during the 'hypoxia hangover'.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Clearing the Air on the Efficacy of Hypoxia Recognition Training.

Aerospace medicine and human performance·2024
Same journal

Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

"It's Shaking Your Entire Construction as a Human Being": A Qualitative Analysis on Epistemic Injustice and Medical Gaslighting Consequences in Patients Living with Chronic Pain.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses
07:59

Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses

Published on: September 19, 2011

Rawls and religious paternalism.

David M Shaw1, Jacob Busch

  • 1Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Switzerland. davidmartinshaw@gmail.com

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|August 24, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper refutes the argument that parents can refuse blood transfusions for children based on religious beliefs. It highlights children's rights, medical necessity, and the principles of John Rawls's liberal social theory.

More Related Videos

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs
08:59

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs

Published on: October 13, 2017

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses
07:59

Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses

Published on: September 19, 2011

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs
08:59

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs

Published on: October 13, 2017

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Political Philosophy
  • Bioethics
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • John Rawls's liberal social theory is interpreted by MacDougall to permit parental refusal of blood transfusions for children on religious grounds.
  • This interpretation raises significant ethical and legal questions regarding children's rights and parental autonomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze and refute MacDougall's argument regarding parental refusal of blood transfusions for children.
  • To explore the implications of Rawls's theory for the protection of children's rights in medical contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical argumentation and textual analysis of Rawls's work.
  • Ethical reasoning concerning children's autonomy, well-being, and freedom of conscience.
  • Critique of MacDougall's interpretation of liberal social theory and its application.

Main Results:

  • MacDougall's argument is flawed due to neglecting children's right to choose their own religion.
  • The argument overlooks the high mortality rates for children denied blood transfusions.
  • It relies on an ambiguous definition of rationality and treats children as parental extensions.
  • Rawls's original position would prioritize protecting individuals from harm and persecution, not allowing religiously motivated child deaths.
  • Rawlsian principles support making decisions for children as one would for oneself, without specific religious doctrines.

Conclusions:

  • Parental refusal of life-saving blood transfusions for children is incompatible with liberal social theory and ethical principles.
  • Children possess rights to bodily autonomy and freedom of conscience that supersede parental religious objections.
  • Protecting children's fundamental rights and well-being must be paramount in medical decision-making, consistent with Rawlsian justice.