Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Automated blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
George S Stergiou1, Anastasios Kollias, Antonios Destounis
1Hypertension Center, Third University Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece. gstergi@med.uoa.gr
Insights
Automated blood pressure monitors show accuracy for systolic but not diastolic measurements in atrial fibrillation patients. They are suitable for home use but not recommended for office measurements.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Hypertension Research
Background:
- Blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging, with current guidelines favoring manual auscultation.
- The reliability of automated blood pressure monitors (ABPMs) in AF patients remains a subject of debate.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze studies validating ABPMs against manual auscultatory methods in patients with sustained atrial fibrillation.
- To assess the accuracy of automated devices for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurement in AF.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of validation studies comparing automated (oscillometric, automated Korotkov) and manual (mercury, aneroid) blood pressure devices.
- Analysis included 12 studies with 566 patients, utilizing home, ambulatory, and office devices.
Main Results:
- Pooled correlation coefficients were higher for SBP (r=0.89) than DBP (r=0.76).
- Automated measurements showed a slight increase compared to manual for SBP (+0.5 mmHg) and DBP (+2.5 mmHg).
- Accuracy varied, with differences within 5 mmHg for SBP in 65% of cases, but less consistent for DBP.
Conclusions:
- Limited evidence and heterogeneity exist for ABPM validation in AF.
- ABPMs appear accurate for SBP but not DBP in AF patients.
- Automated monitors are deemed appropriate for self-home monitoring but not for office use in AF populations, particularly the elderly.
Objective:
The measurement of blood pressure in atrial fibrillation is considered as difficult and uncertain, and current guidelines recommend the use of the auscultatory method. The accuracy of automated blood pressure monitors in atrial fibrillation remains controversial.
Method:
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of studies comparing automated (oscillometric or automated Korotkov) versus manual auscultatory blood pressure measurements (mercury or aneroid sphygmomanometer) in patients with sustained atrial fibrillation.
Results:
Twelve validations were analyzed (566 patients; five home, three ambulatory and three office devices). Pooled correlation coefficients between automated and manual blood pressure measurements were stronger for SBP than DBP (r = 0.89 versus 0.76, P < 0.001). Automated measurements were higher than manual measurements [pooled average SBP difference 0.5 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.9, 1.9; DBP 2.5 mmHg, 95%CI -0.6, 5.7). The mean difference was within 5 mmHg in six and four (SBP and DBP, respectively) of six validations. The SD of mean difference was within 8 mmHg in two and three (SBP and DBP, respectively) of four validations. The proportion of absolute automated-manual differences within 5 mmHg was at least 65% in four and two (SBP and DBP, respectively) of eight validations. Three studies showed no impact of heart rate on the automated-manual blood pressure differences.
Conclusion:
There is limited evidence and significant heterogeneity in the studies that validated automated blood pressure monitors in atrial fibrillation. These monitors appear to be accurate in measuring SBP but not DBP. Given that atrial fibrillation is common in the elderly, in whom systolic hypertension is more common and important than diastolic hypertension, automated monitors appear to be appropriate for self-home but not for office measurement.
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Measurement of Blood Pressure
