Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evolution of stressors for healthcare workers over the COVID-19 pandemic.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Flour exposure, sensitization and respiratory health among Alberta trainee bakers.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2022
Same author

Respiratory health, occupation and the healthy worker effect.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2020
Same author

Course participation and the recognition and reporting of occupational ill-health.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2019
Same author

Workers' recovery from concussions presenting to the emergency department.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2019
Same author

Systematic review: plantar fasciitis and prolonged weight bearing.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

How physicians allocate causation: a scenario study with factorial design.

J Beach1, Y Chen, N Cherry

  • 1Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2T4, Canada. jeremy.beach@ualberta.ca

Occupational Medicine (Oxford, England)
|August 24, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Physicians

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Medicine
  • Family Medicine
  • Medical Decision Making

Background:

  • Causation is critical for diagnosing work-related diseases.
  • Physicians' factors influencing work-relatedness assessments are unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify factors influencing family physicians' causation assessments for suspected work-related illnesses.
  • To understand how physicians determine work-relatedness in patient cases.

Main Methods:

  • Family physicians surveyed using case scenarios with varied causal factors.
  • Visual analogue scales used to record responses.
  • Physicians grouped by prior Workers Compensation Board reporting history.

Main Results:

  • Case characteristics (condition, causal factors) influenced work-relatedness opinions.
  • Patient's work, symptom timing, and patient opinion were key physician considerations.
  • Strong non-workplace causes primarily influenced 'not work-related' decisions.

Conclusions:

  • Case scenario details, not physician characteristics, were more influential in determining work-relatedness opinions.
  • Physician reporting history did not impact causation assessments.