Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (Cf-PWV) to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Time to twist: marker of systolic dysfunction in Africans with hypertension
Nirvarthi Maharaj1, Bijoy K Khandheria, Ferande Peters
1Division of Cardiology, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Aims:
Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) has emerged as a quantitative technique to assess left ventricular (LV) function via twist mechanics. Hypertension-associated changes in LV twist have not been previously evaluated in African patients with LV systolic dysfunction. This study evaluates LV twist dynamics in hypertensive patients with a low ejection fraction (EF).
Methods And Results:
Forty-one hypertensive patients with EF <45% and normal coronary angiography (HTLEF group) were compared with 41 control subjects using STE. Peak apical rotation (AR) and isochronous basal rotation (BR) were measured, as was net twist (maximal value of simultaneous AR-BR). Rigid body rotation (RBR) was defined as AR and BR occurring in the same direction. Of 41 HTLEF patients, 28 (68%) had normal twist pattern, whereas 13 (32%) exhibited RBR; 11 of those 13 exhibited clockwise rotation. AR (1.89° ± 0.99 vs. 7.15° ± 2.26; P < 0.0001), BR (1.44° ± 0.78 vs. -3.75° ± 1.61; P < 0.0001), and net twist (3.3° ± 1.17 vs. 10.9° ± 2.7; P < 0.0001) were lower in HTLEF patients. The subgroup with clockwise RBR showed greater LV dysfunction (EF: 27.9 ± 5.8 vs. 35 ± 7.5%; P = 0.005) and more spherical LV geometry in both diastole and systole (P = 0.0009 and P = 0.0002, respectively) compared with those who had a normal pattern of twist. In the HTLEF subgroup with normal twist pattern, AR (r = 0.57; P = 0.002) and net twist (r = 0.57; P = 0.002) correlated with EF.
Conclusions:
LV twist in patients with hypertension and EF <45% is diminished. Apical rotation and net twist are good correlates for EF in hypertensive patients with EF <45%.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Hypertension I: Introduction
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)