Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Cost of atrial fibrillation: invasive vs non-invasive management in 2012
1Heart Rhythm Program, Southlake Regional Health Centre, 105-712 Davis Drive, Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 8C3, Canada. y.khaykin@utoronto.ca
Insights
Atrial fibrillation (AF) care presents significant costs. This paper examines the economic impact of conventional and novel invasive AF treatments, reviewing their comparative cost-effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia with substantial patient, caregiver, and societal costs.
- AF as a chronic illness incurs significant expenses from clinical management, complications, and lost productivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the economic burden of conventional and invasive AF treatment strategies.
- To review evidence on the comparative cost-effectiveness of different AF management approaches.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies evaluating the costs associated with AF care.
- Comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness data for conventional and invasive AF interventions.
Main Results:
- Conventional AF management incurs ongoing costs related to chronic illness.
- Novel invasive AF treatments offer potential cures but involve high upfront expenses.
- Evidence on comparative cost-effectiveness of these strategies requires further review.
Conclusions:
- Understanding the economic implications of AF treatments is crucial for healthcare resource allocation.
- A comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis is needed to guide optimal AF management strategies.
- Balancing treatment efficacy with economic feasibility is essential for sustainable AF care.
Abstract:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. It places an enormous burden on the patients, caregivers and the society at large. As a chronic illness, AF accrues significant costs related to clinical presentation, complications and loss of productivity. Novel invasive approaches to AF promise a cure in some patients and a significant reduction in AF burden in others, but are very expensive. This paper will address the cost of conventional and invasive strategies in AF care and will review the evidence on the comparative cost effectiveness of these approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

