Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

[Pre-implant posterior mandibular reconstruction].

J-F Tulasne1, J Guiol, Y Jeblaoui

  • 126, avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France. jftulasne@gmail.com

Revue De Stomatologie Et De Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale
|August 28, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Orbital in juries in wartime: Historical study from Paul Tessier's work in Iran.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2022
Same author

Use of buccal fat pads to prevent vestibular gingival recession of zygomatic implants.

Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery·2017
Same author

[Morbidity of autologous bone harvesting in implantology: Literature review from 1990 to 2015].

Revue de stomatologie, de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et de chirurgie orale·2016
Same author

[Anterior mandibular bone augmentation techniques. Literature review].

Revue de stomatologie, de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et de chirurgie orale·2015
Same author

[Anterior mandibular bone grafts by sub-mental approach].

Revue de stomatologie, de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et de chirurgie orale·2015
Same author

[Le Fort I osteotomies combined with post-operative bone grafts].

Revue de stomatologie, de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et de chirurgie orale·2015
Same journal

[Proceedings of the 48th Congress SFSCMF Surgery and pre-implantation and implantology,27–29 September 2012, Versailles, France].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2013
Same journal

[Contribution and limitations of MIS(®) screwed expanders in the jaws: illustration from clinical cases and comparison of the osseous volume from three-dimensional radiographic pictures].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
Same journal

[Complications of head and neck skin expansion].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
Same journal

[Complex fronto-orbital reconstruction with a PEEK prosthesis and skin expansion: about a case].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
Same journal

[PEEK customized implant for skull esthetic reconstruction].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
Same journal

[Subcutaneous malar nodule].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
See all related articles

Cranial bone grafts effectively reconstruct posterior mandible defects, achieving significant bone augmentation. This study highlights the onlay graft technique

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Dental Implantology

Context:

  • Posterior mandible reconstruction presents significant challenges due to severe bone resorption.
  • Traditional techniques like alveolar distraction and guided bone regeneration have limitations.
  • Cranial bone grafts offer a viable solution for complex mandibular defects.

Purpose:

  • To review the literature on pre-implant posterior mandible reconstruction.
  • To report the outcomes of 107 patients reconstructed with cranial bone grafts.
  • To evaluate the efficacy and complications of the onlay graft technique for severe mandibular bone loss.

Summary:

  • A 15-year study of 167 patients undergoing posterior mandible reconstruction using cranial bone grafts.

More Related Videos

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

  • Achieved mean vertical bone augmentation of 6.66–7.83 mm and horizontal augmentation of 7.16–8.11 mm.
  • Reported complications included mental nerve dysesthesia (6.5%), graft exposure (1.8%), and resorption (4.2%), with successful implant placement possible post-reconstruction.

    • Impact:

    • Cranial onlay grafts are effective for severe posterior mandible reconstruction, even when other methods fail.
    • The onlay graft technique is versatile, suitable for most cases except those with limited occlusal space.
    • This study supports the onlay graft as a reliable method for pre-implant posterior mandibular reconstruction, improving implant success rates.