Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Published on: February 21, 2011
An examination of intrasubject variability on the Dysphonia Severity Index
Shaheen N Awan1, Sara A Miesemer, Teresa A Nicolia
1Department of Audiology & Speech Pathology, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania 17815-1301, USA. sawan@bloomu.edu
Objectives/Hypothesis:
The purpose of this study was to expand on previous literature regarding the intrasubject variability of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) by incorporating a larger sample of participants and by examining the test-retest mean differences and intrasubject variability not only in the DSI but also within its component measures.
Study Design:
Longitudinal and within-subject design.
Methods:
The DSI and component measures of jitter, maximum phonation time (MPT), lowest vocal intensity, and highest phonational frequency (F(0)) were obtained from 49 normal voiced participants (21 males and 28 females) between the ages of 18-25 years. Each participant was tested in three testing sessions with an approximate 1-week interval between each testing session.
Results:
These results indicated that the mean DSI and its component measures of high F(0) and MPT are quite stable across time (ie, no significant differences across time and strong intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs]), whereas Bland-Altman analyses indicated that the within-subject 1-week test-retest variability on the DSI for normal voiced subjects may be expected to be within ±2.27, and the 2-week test-retest variability may be expected to be within ±2.66. In addition, weak ICC results indicated that increased variability may also be expected in the DSI component measures of low decibel and jitter. No evidence of a test-practice effect on repeated DSI measurements was observed.
Conclusions:
The findings of this study are in agreement with previous data regarding the intrasubject variability of the DSI. Changes in DSI that exceed ±2.27-2.66 may be necessary to reflect significant changes in voice function. The observed test-retest variability in the DSI is relatively large in relation to the initially reported DSI range of +5 (normal voice) to -5 (severely disordered voice). Rather than the use of ±2 standard deviations (SDs) as a guideline for significant change (±2.27-2.66), DSI change of ±1.5 SDs may be clinically useful, resulting in a more liberal level of ±1.74 (within 1 week) to 2.04 (within 2 weeks) as a guideline for significant changes in voice function.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...
