Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Patients with small left ventricular size undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty have worse intraprocedural outcomes
Creighton Don1, Pritha P Gupta, Christian Witzke
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. cwdon@u.washington.edu
Insights
Patients with smaller left ventricular (LV) chambers undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) face higher risks of procedural and in-hospital complications. This highlights the importance of LV size in BAV outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is a critical component of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
- Concerns exist regarding increased complications in patients with small, thickened ventricles during and after BAV.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between left ventricular (LV) chamber size and outcomes following aortic valvuloplasty.
- To determine if smaller LV end-diastolic diameters (LVEDD) predict adverse procedural or hospital events.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of patients with severe, symptomatic calcific aortic stenosis undergoing retrograde BAV.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients with LVEDD < 4.0 cm and LVEDD ≥ 4.0 cm.
- Multivariate logistic regression to identify independent predictors of complications.
Main Results:
- Patients with smaller LV chambers (LVEDD < 4.0 cm) were predominantly female and had smaller body surface area.
- A significantly higher rate of intraprocedural complications (death, arrest, collapse, tamponade) was observed in the smaller LV group (32.3% vs. 11.5%).
- Smaller LVEDD (< 4.0 cm) was an independent predictor of both procedural (OR 5.1) and in-hospital complications (OR 3.8).
Conclusions:
- Patients with smaller LV chambers undergoing BAV experience significantly worse procedural and in-hospital outcomes.
- LV chamber size is a crucial factor influencing the safety and efficacy of BAV procedures.
Objectives:
To evaluate the impact of left ventricular (LV) chamber size on procedural and hospital outcomes of patients undergoing aortic valvuloplasty.
Background:
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is used as an integral step during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Patients with small, thickened ventricles are thought to have more complications during and following BAV.
Methods:
Retrospective study of consecutive patients with severe, symptomatic calcific aortic stenosis who underwent retrograde BAV at Massachusetts General Hospital. We compared patients with left ventricular end-diastolic diameters (LVEDD) <4.0 cm (n = 31) to those with LVEDD ≥4.0 cm (n = 78). Baseline and procedural characteristics as well as clinical outcomes were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used for the adjusted analysis.
Results:
Patients with smaller LV chamber size were mostly women (80.7% vs. 19.4%, P < 0.01) and had a smaller body surface area (BSA), (1.61 ± 0.20 m(2) vs. 1.79 ± 0.25 m(2) , P < 0.01). Patients with smaller LV chamber size had higher ejection fractions and thicker ventricles. Otherwise, baseline characteristics were similar. The intraprocedural composite of death, cardiopulmonary arrest, intubation, hemodynamic collapse, and tamponade was higher for patients with LVEDD < 4.0 cm (32.3% v. 11.5%, P = 0.01). Adjusting for age, gender, BSA, LV pressure, and New York Heart Association class, LVEDD < 4.0 cm remained an independent predictor of procedural (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.4-18.2) and in-hospital complications (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.2-11.6).
Conclusions:
Compared to patients undergoing BAV with LVEDD ≥4.0 cm, those with smaller LV chambers had worse procedural and in-hospital outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
