Memory CD4+ T-cell-mediated protection depends on secondary effectors that are distinct from and superior to primary...

Whether differences between naive cell-derived primary (1°) and memory cell-derived secondary (2°) CD4(+) T-cell effectors contribute to protective recall responses is unclear. Here, we compare these effectors directly after influenza A virus infection. Both develop with similar kinetics, but 2° effectors accumulate in greater number in the infected lung and are the critical component of memory CD4(+) T-cell-mediated protection against influenza A virus, independent of earlier-acting memory-cell helper functions. Phenotypic, functional, and transcriptome analyses indicate that 2° effectors share organ-specific expression patterns with 1° effectors but are more multifunctional, with more multicytokine (IFN-γ(+)/IL-2(+)/TNF(+))-producing cells and contain follicular helper T-cell populations not only in the spleen and draining lymph nodes but also in the lung. In addition, they express more CD127 and NKG2A but less ICOS and Lag-3 than 1° effectors and express higher levels of several genes associated with survival and migration. Targeting two differentially expressed molecules, NKG2A and Lag-3, reveals differential regulation of 1° and 2° effector functions during pathogen challenge.