Related Experiment Videos
Comparative effectiveness of 2 β-blockers in hypertensive patients
Emily D Parker1, Karen L Margolis, Nicole K Trower
1HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440-1524, USA. Emily.D.Parker@Healthpartners.com
Insights
For patients with hypertension, atenolol and metoprolol tartrate showed no significant difference in preventing cardiovascular events. This study highlights the utility of large registries for comparative effectiveness research in hypertension management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Hypertension Management
Background:
- Established efficacy of certain beta-blockers post-myocardial infarction (MI) and for heart failure (HF).
- Recent questions regarding beta-blocker effectiveness for cardiovascular (CV) event prevention in hypertension.
- Uncertainty whether observed effects are a class-wide phenomenon for beta-blockers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of atenolol versus metoprolol tartrate in preventing incident cardiovascular events.
- To evaluate these outcomes in a large cohort of patients with newly initiated beta-blocker therapy for hypertension.
- To determine if observed differences are a class effect or specific to individual beta-blockers.
Main Methods:
- Utilized electronic medical record and health plan data from the Cardiovascular Research Network Hypertension Registry (2000-2009).
- Compared incident MI, HF, and stroke in new beta-blocker users without prior CV disease.
- Employed Cox proportional hazards regression with standard covariate adjustment and propensity score-matching.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in hazard ratios for MI, HF, or stroke between metoprolol tartrate and atenolol users.
- Hazard ratios for metoprolol tartrate users were 0.99 (MI), 0.99 (HF), and 0.99 (stroke) compared to atenolol.
- Propensity score matching analysis of 22,352 patients yielded similar non-significant findings.
Conclusions:
- Atenolol and metoprolol tartrate demonstrated comparable effectiveness in preventing incident CV events in hypertensive patients.
- Findings suggest no significant difference between these two beta-blockers for the studied outcomes.
- Large patient registries are valuable for comparative effectiveness research in hypertension when randomized trials are limited.
Background:
Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of selected β-blockers for preventing cardiovascular (CV) events in patients following myocardial infarction (MI) or with heart failure (HF). However, the effectiveness of β-blockers for preventing CV events in patients with hypertension has been questioned recently, but it is unclear whether this is a class effect.
Methods:
Using electronic medical record and health plan data from the Cardiovascular Research Network Hypertension Registry, we compared incident MI, HF, and stroke in patients who were new β-blocker users between 2000 and 2009. Patients had no history of CV disease and had not previously filled a prescription for a β-blocker. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the associations of atenolol and metoprolol tartrate with incident CV events using both standard covariate adjustment (n = 120,978) and propensity score-matching methods (n = 22,352).
Results:
During follow-up (median, 5.2 years), there were 3517 incident MI, 3272 incident HF, and 3664 incident stroke events. Hazard ratios for MI, HF, and stroke in metoprolol tartrate users were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.02), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.01), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.02), respectively. An alternative approach using propensity score matching yielded similar results in 11,176 new metoprolol tartrate users, who were similar to 11,176 new atenolol users with regard to demographic and clinical characteristics.
Conclusions:
There were no statistically significant differences in incident CV events between atenolol and metoprolol tartrate users with hypertension. Large registries similar to the one used in this analysis may be useful for addressing comparative effectiveness questions that are unlikely to be resolved by randomized trials.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of β-Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions of β-Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of β-Receptor Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers