Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations
Published on: October 29, 2016
Prey-predator dynamics in rotifers: density-dependent consequences of spatial heterogeneity due to surface attachment
Olav Vadstein1, Lasse M Olsen, Tom Andersen
1Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Department of Biotechnology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway. olav.vadstein@biotech.ntnu.no
Abstract:
Classical models of prey-predator interactions assume that per capita prey consumption is dependent on prey density alone and that prey consumption (functional response) and consumer proliferation (numerical response) operate on the same timescales and without time lags. Several modifications have been proposed for resolving this timescale discrepancy, including variants where the functional response depends on both prey and predator densities. A microcosm system with the rotifer Brachionus 'Nevada' feeding on the prasinophyte Tetraselmis sp. showed significant (P < 0.0005) increases in steady-state biomasses of both prey and predators with increasing carrying capacity (represented by total phosphorus of the growth medium), which is inconsistent with predictions based on the traditional prey-only-dependent functional response. We provide data indicating that surfaces where the predator can attach provide a high-quality habitat for rotifers, which can result in a predator-dependent functional response. We also show that partitioning between the attached and free-swimming habitats was fast compared to the timescale of the numerical response. When attached to surfaces, rotifers maximized net energy gain by avoiding the high cost of swimming and by increased food capture due to reduced viscous drag. A mathematical model with prey-dependent functional response and wall-attached and free-swimming fractions of the population describes our data adequately. We discuss the implications of this finding for extrapolating microcosm experiments to systems with other surface-to-volume ratios, and to what extent our findings may apply to other popular model organisms for prey-predator interaction.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Microbial Interactions: Predation
Microbial Interactions: Competition
Diversity of Protists III
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores
Microenvironments

