Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
Classification of trigonocephaly in metopic synostosis
Joel S Beckett1, Priyanka Chadha, John A Persing
1New Haven, Conn. From the Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine.
Background:
The orbitofrontal deformity in metopic synostosis is recognized clinically but has not been quantitatively defined in a large patient population. The authors' purpose was to document the dysmorphology in metopic synostosis and define subtype gradations.
Methods:
Demographic and computed tomographic information was recorded. Three-dimensional computed tomographic renderings were created digitally. Craniometric analysis was conducted for endocranial bifrontal angle, interzygomaticofrontal suture and interdacryon distance, and angle of orbital aperture to the midline.
Results:
Thirty-five computed tomographic scans were analyzed: 25 affected infants (median age, 5 months) and 10 controls (median age, 6 months). The endocranial bifrontal angle ranged from 100 to 148 degrees in metopic patients and 134 to 160 degrees in controls. The metopic group was split into severe metopic (100 to 124 degrees) and moderate metopic (124 to 148 degrees) synostosis. The endocranial bifrontal angle was significantly different among severe metopic, moderate metopic, and control patients. Interzygomaticofrontal suture of the severe group was less than in both moderate (p = 0.0043) and control (p = 0.011) groups. Interdacryon distance was smaller in severe versus moderate (p = 0.0083) and control (p = 0.0002) groups. The orbital rim angle of the severe group was more acute than that in the moderate (p = 0.0106) and control (p = 0.0062) groups. Except for endocranial bifrontal angle, there was no difference between moderate metopic and control groups in any analysis.
Conclusions:
Metopic synostosis can be divided into two distinct severity indices. The severe group has significantly narrower orbitofrontal dimensions, whereas the moderate group does not differ from control. Characterization of trigonocephaly may shed light on the etiopathogenesis of disease.
Related Concept Videos
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An immobile...
Epilepsy ll: Types
Sutures of the Skull
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
Cranial Bones: Lateral View
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
Crystallographic Point Groups