Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Allosteric Proteins-ATCase01:19

Allosteric Proteins-ATCase

Binding sites linkages can regulate a protein's function.  For example, enzyme activity is often regulated through a feedback mechanism where the end product of the biochemical process serves as an inhibitor.
Aspartate transcarbamoylase (ATCase) is a cytosolic enzyme that catalyzes the condensation of L-aspartate and carbamoyl phosphate to  N-carbamoyl-L-aspartate. This reaction is the first step in pyrimidine biosynthesis. UTP and CTP, the end products of the pyrimidine synthesis pathway,...
Staphylococcal Skin Infections01:29

Staphylococcal Skin Infections

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive coccus that resides harmlessly on the skin and mucous membranes of healthy individuals. When the skin barrier is breached, it can shift from a commensal to an opportunistic pathogen. This transition is facilitated by surface adhesins, such as clumping factor B and S. aureus surface protein G (SasG), which bind to structural proteins, including loricrin and cytokeratin, in the damaged epidermis. Protein A, another key factor, binds the Fc region of...
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence the...
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance01:25

Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) presents a critical public health threat, arising from its capacity to resist β-lactam antibiotics due to acquisition of the mecA gene within the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). This gene encodes penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), which impairs binding efficacy of methicillin and other β-lactams. MRSA has evolved into distinct clonal lineages impacting humans and animals alike, reinforcing its significance within the One...
Enzymes02:34

Enzymes

Inside living organisms, enzymes act as catalysts for many biochemical reactions involved in cellular metabolism. The role of enzymes is to reduce the activation energies of biochemical reactions by forming complexes with its substrates. The lowering of activation energies favor an increase in the rates of biochemical reactions.
Enzyme deficiencies can often translate into life-threatening diseases. For example, a genetic abnormality resulting in the deficiency of the enzyme G6PD...
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA01:25

Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA

Antibiotic resistance in bacteria arises when microorganisms evolve the ability to withstand drugs designed to kill them or inhibit their growth, rendering once-effective treatments useless. This phenomenon, driven by genetic change and selection under antibiotic exposure, poses a profound threat to modern medicine. Mechanisms include drug-inactivating enzymes (e.g., β-lactamases), efflux pumps that eject antibiotics, mutations altering antibiotic targets, decreased drug uptake, and acquisition...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Loss of the type VII secretion ATPase EssC promotes biofilm formation of <i>Staphylococcus</i> <i>aureus</i> under acidic stress.

Biofilm·2026
Same author

An achromatic neutron lens.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A proposed method for locating the tibial attachment for medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction: A cadaveric anatomical and imaging study.

Journal of experimental orthopaedics·2026
Same author

Ginsenoside Rg3 ameliorates di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-induced spermatogenic impairment via attenuating ferroptosis and restoring sertoli cell secretory dysfunction.

Journal of environmental sciences (China)·2026
Same author

GSDME acts as an epigenetic modifier to promote melanoma development via centriole biogenesis regulator PLK4.

Cell death and differentiation·2026
Same author

Influence of extraction conditions on self-assembled colloidal particle formation in ginseng aqueous extract.

Food chemistry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Synthesis of Masarimycin, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of Gram-Positive Bacterial Growth
09:10

Synthesis of Masarimycin, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of Gram-Positive Bacterial Growth

Published on: January 7, 2022

Partially overlapping substrate specificities of staphylococcal group A sortases.

Mark J J B Sibbald1, Xiao-Mei Yang, Eleni Tsompanidou

  • 1Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Proteomics
|August 30, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how two enzymes, SrtA and SrtC, help attach proteins to the cell walls of staphylococci bacteria. When the gene for SrtA was deleted in two species, some proteins moved from the cell wall to the growth medium. However, some proteins still stayed attached through noncovalent interactions. Introducing SrtA from either species restored protein localization in mutant strains. A second enzyme, SrtC, partially restored protein localization and biofilm formation in some cases. The results suggest that SrtA and SrtC share some, but not all, protein targets. The study also found that sortase levels may influence biofilm formation in some staphylococci. These findings help clarify how protein sorting contributes to bacterial surface attachment and biofilm formation.

Keywords:
sortase substrate specificityGram-positive cell wall proteinsstaphylococcal biofilm formationbacterial protein anchoring

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

The Determination of Protease Specificity in Mouse Tissue Extracts by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Manipulating PH to Cause Specificity Changes
09:47

The Determination of Protease Specificity in Mouse Tissue Extracts by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Manipulating PH to Cause Specificity Changes

Published on: May 25, 2018

Defining Substrate Specificities for Lipase and Phospholipase Candidates
08:59

Defining Substrate Specificities for Lipase and Phospholipase Candidates

Published on: November 23, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Synthesis of Masarimycin, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of Gram-Positive Bacterial Growth
09:10

Synthesis of Masarimycin, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of Gram-Positive Bacterial Growth

Published on: January 7, 2022

The Determination of Protease Specificity in Mouse Tissue Extracts by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Manipulating PH to Cause Specificity Changes
09:47

The Determination of Protease Specificity in Mouse Tissue Extracts by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Manipulating PH to Cause Specificity Changes

Published on: May 25, 2018

Defining Substrate Specificities for Lipase and Phospholipase Candidates
08:59

Defining Substrate Specificities for Lipase and Phospholipase Candidates

Published on: November 23, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Microbial cell wall biology
  • Protein sorting in Gram-positive bacteria
  • Biofilm formation mechanisms

Background:

Gram-positive bacteria use sortases to attach surface proteins to their cell walls. These enzymes recognize a specific motif, LPxTG, at the protein's C-terminus. Prior research has shown that sortases are essential for anchoring proteins to the cell wall via covalent bonds. However, some proteins remain cell wall bound even in the absence of sortases, suggesting noncovalent interactions may also play a role. The role of multiple sortase homologs in staphylococci has remained unclear. No prior work had resolved whether different sortases share overlapping substrate repertoires. This gap motivated further investigation into how sortase deletion affects protein localization and function. Understanding these mechanisms could clarify how biofilm formation is regulated in staphylococci. This paper contributes by exploring the functional overlap between two sortase homologs in Staphylococcus species.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aimed to investigate how the deletion of srtA genes affects the localization of LPxTG proteins in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. The researchers sought to determine whether these proteins remain cell wall bound through noncovalent interactions when sortase A is absent. They also wanted to test if introducing srtA genes from either species could restore protein localization. Additionally, the study aimed to examine the role of a second sortase homolog, SrtC, in S. epidermidis. The researchers hypothesized that SrtC might partially compensate for the loss of SrtA. Another goal was to assess whether sortase activity influences biofilm formation in these species. This work sought to clarify the extent of functional overlap between SrtA and SrtC. The findings could help explain how protein sorting contributes to staphylococcal biofilm formation.

Main Methods:

The researchers deleted the srtA genes in S. aureus and S. epidermidis to observe the effects on protein localization. They used proteomics and Western blotting to analyze cell wall-associated proteins in mutant strains. To test for functional redundancy, they introduced srtA genes from either species into the mutant strains. They also examined the effects of ectopic expression of a second sortase homolog, SrtC, in S. epidermidis mutants. Biofilm formation was assessed in srtA mutant strains after SrtC expression. The team compared the levels of cell wall-bound proteins in wild-type and mutant strains. They evaluated whether SrtC could fully or partially restore protein localization and biofilm formation. The study focused on the overlap in substrate specificity between SrtA and SrtC. These methods allowed the researchers to determine the functional roles of these enzymes in protein sorting.

Main Results:

Deletion of srtA genes in S. aureus and S. epidermidis caused several LPxTG proteins to appear in the growth medium rather than remaining cell wall bound. Proteomics and Western blotting showed that some proteins still adhered to the cell wall through noncovalent interactions. Ectopic expression of srtA genes from either species restored protein localization in mutant strains. However, SrtC, a second sortase homolog in S. epidermidis, only partially reverted the dislocation of certain proteins. Biofilm formation defects in srtA mutants were also partially corrected by SrtC expression. Overexpression of SrtA increased biofilm formation in some strains, suggesting a role in this process. The findings indicate that SrtA and SrtC share a partially overlapping substrate repertoire. The data suggest that sortase levels may limit biofilm formation in some staphylococci. These results highlight the functional redundancy and specificity of sortase enzymes.

Conclusions:

The study found that deletion of srtA genes leads to dislocation of LPxTG proteins from the cell wall to the growth medium. Proteomics confirmed that some proteins remain cell wall bound through noncovalent interactions. Ectopic expression of srtA genes from either species restored protein localization in mutant strains. SrtC partially restored protein localization and biofilm formation in some cases. These findings suggest that SrtA and SrtC have partially overlapping substrate specificities. The results indicate that sortase activity may be limiting for biofilm formation in some staphylococci. The authors propose that multiple sortase homologs can partially compensate for each other's loss. Their findings support the idea that sortase levels influence biofilm formation in staphylococci. No broader implications were stated beyond the observed effects in the tested strains.

The study found that SrtA and SrtC have partially overlapping substrate specificities in staphylococci.

They introduced SrtC into srtA mutant cells and observed partial restoration of protein localization and biofilm formation.

This motif is recognized by sortases to anchor proteins to the cell wall in Gram-positive bacteria.

Proteomics and Western blotting showed some proteins remained cell wall bound despite srtA deletion.

No, SrtC reverted biofilm formation in some, but not all, tested srtA mutant strains.

The findings suggest that sortase levels may be limiting for biofilm formation in some staphylococci.