Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of zero.

Protein Organization

Protein Organization

Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence.

Structural Protein Function

Structural Protein Function

Structural proteins are a category of proteins responsible for functions ranging from cell shape and movement to providing support to major structures such as bones, cartilage, hair, and muscles. This group includes proteins such as collagen, actin, myosin, and keratin.
Collagen, the most abundant protein in mammals, is found throughout the body. In connective tissue, such as skin, ligaments, and tendons, it provides tensile strength and elasticity. In bones and teeth, it mineralizes to form...

Structural Protein Function

Structural Protein Function

Structural proteins are a category of proteins responsible for functions ranging from cell shape and movement to providing support to major structures such as bones, cartilage, hair, and muscles. This group includes proteins such as collagen, actin, myosin, and keratin.
Collagen, the most abundant protein in mammals, is found throughout the body. In connective tissue, such as skin, ligaments, and tendons, it provides tensile strength and elasticity. In bones and teeth, it mineralizes to form...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Diversity and distribution of bacterial DNA polymerases.

Nucleic acids research·2026

Same author

Systematic analyses of lipid mobilization by human lipid transfer proteins.

Nature·2026

Same author

Activation of the SPARDA defense system by filament assembly using a beta-relay signaling mechanism widespread in prokaryotic Argonautes.

Cell research·2025

Same author

An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems including rare variants.

Nature microbiology·2025

Same author

<i>Helicobacter pylori</i> base-excision restriction enzyme in stomach carcinogenesis.

PNAS nexus·2025

Same author

Databases and web-based tools for studying structures of protein-nucleic acid complexes.

Current opinion in structural biology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

CAD-score: a new contact area difference-based function for evaluation of protein structural models.

Kliment Olechnovič¹, Eleonora Kulberkytė, Ceslovas Venclovas

¹Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University, Graičiūno 8, LT-02241 Vilnius, Lithuania.

|August 31, 2012

Summary

A new protein model evaluation function, CAD-score, assesses physical contacts using residue-residue contact area differences. It offers a robust and continuous measure for protein structure prediction benchmarking.

More Related Videos

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Area of Science:

Computational biology
Structural bioinformatics
Protein structure prediction

Background:

Protein model evaluation is crucial for benchmarking prediction methods.
Existing scores often lack robustness and consistent assessment across different structures.
There is a need for improved evaluation functions that capture physical realism.

Purpose of the Study:

Introduce CAD-score, a novel evaluation function for protein models.
Quantify differences between physical contacts in predicted models and native structures.
Provide a robust and parameter-free scoring system for diverse protein structures.

Main Methods:

Utilized the concept of residue-residue contact area difference (CAD).
Derived contact areas using Voronoi tessellation of protein structures.
Developed a continuous, threshold-free scoring function with built-in handling for missing residues.

Main Results:

CAD-score demonstrated robust performance comparable to GDT-TS on single-domain proteins.
CAD-score showed a stronger preference for physically realistic protein models.
The score balanced assessment of domain rearrangement and evaluated inter-domain/subunit interfaces.

Conclusions:

CAD-score offers a more balanced and physically realistic evaluation of protein models than GDT-TS.
It provides a unified approach for assessing single-domain, multi-domain, and multi-subunit structures.
CAD-score serves as a valuable tool for protein structure prediction benchmarking and analysis.