Distraction osteogenesis using a monolateral external fixator for infected non-union of the femur with bone loss

Sumit Arora1, Sumit Batra, Vikas Gupta

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India. mamc_309@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Insights

Distraction osteogenesis with a monolateral external fixator effectively treats infected non-union of the femoral shaft. This bone transport method achieved union and eradicated infection in all patients, ensuring satisfactory outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Trauma reconstruction
  • Bone regeneration

Background:

  • Infected non-union of the femoral shaft presents a significant challenge in orthopedic reconstruction.
  • Bone loss, often exceeding 5 cm, complicates treatment and necessitates advanced techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of distraction osteogenesis/bone transport using a monolateral external fixator for infected non-union of the femoral shaft.
  • To assess outcomes including bone healing, infection eradication, functional status, and complications.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 15 patients (13 male, 2 female) with infected non-union of the femoral shaft and bone defects >5 cm.
  • Patients underwent debridement, bone resection, and subsequent bone transport with a monolateral external fixator.
  • Assessment included lengthening index, radiographic consolidation, functional outcomes, and complications.

Main Results:

  • All 15 patients achieved bone union and eradication of infection, with excellent or good bone healing in all cases.
  • Functional outcomes were rated as excellent (5), good (8), or fair (2).
  • No neurovascular complications, joint subluxations, or refractures occurred; common issues were knee stiffness (6 patients) and flexion contracture (1 patient).

Conclusions:

  • Distraction osteogenesis via monolateral external fixator is a safe and effective treatment for infected femoral shaft non-union with bone loss.
  • The technique demonstrates high rates of bone union, infection control, and patient satisfaction.
  • While effective, potential complications like joint stiffness should be monitored and managed.