Technical and perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position

Ross F Goldberg1, Steven P Bowers, Michael Parker

  • 1Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic-Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. rossfgoldberg@gmail.com

Surgical Endoscopy
|September 1, 2012
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Prone minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a viable approach for esophageal cancer. Higher preoperative comorbidity scores in patients undergoing prone MIE correlate with increased risk of pulmonary complications.

Area of Science:

  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) utilizes video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal dissection.
  • The prone position in MIE offers advantages like gravity-aided lung retraction.
  • Assessing perioperative outcomes of prone MIE concerning patient comorbidities is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate perioperative outcomes following prone minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).
  • To analyze the relationship between preoperative patient comorbidities and outcomes after prone MIE.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 42 patients undergoing three-field prone MIE.
  • Preoperative comorbidities quantified using the Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (low, moderate, high risk).
  • Postoperative complications stratified using the Clavien Classification Scale (minor, major).

Main Results:

  • Median hospital stay was 8 days; median ICU stay was 2 days.
  • 88% of patients were extubated on the day of surgery.
  • Higher comorbidity scores correlated with increased rates of major postoperative complications (e.g., arrhythmias, pneumonia).

Conclusions:

  • Prone MIE is a supported surgical approach for esophageal cancer treatment.
  • Pulmonary complications remain a risk despite clinical pathways like immediate extubation.
  • Preoperative comorbidity assessment is vital for managing risks in prone MIE.