Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management01:21

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management

Surgical interventions for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are essential in managing symptoms and addressing complications. The selection of surgical procedures is contingent upon the specific conditions and complications that stem from these illnesses.
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Ostomy Care01:24

Ostomy Care

Introduction
An ostomy is a surgical procedure that creates an artificial opening from the intestines to the outside of the body, allowing for the rerouting of effluent. This opening is known as a stoma. A stoma usually protrudes above the skin surface, appearing pink or red, moist, and round, and it lacks nerve sensations.
There are different types of ostomies, including colostomies, ileostomies, and urostomies:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating core surgical training selection: Associations between the Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA), interview performance and offer outcomes in the 2025 UK national cohort.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland·2026
Same author

Algorithm-Based Care for Treating Chronic Pancreatitis: A Nationwide Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Diversity in Surgery: Ethnic, Gender, and LGBTQ+ Representations Among United Kingdom Surgical Residents and Consultants.

Journal of surgical education·2025
Same author

Urgency adjusted outcomes of emergency abdominal surgery for inflammatory bowel disease.

World journal of surgery·2024
Same author

A call for clarity: a scoping review of predictors of poor outcome after emergency abdominal surgery for inflammatory bowel disease.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2023
Same author

Beyond high-risk: analysis of the outcomes of extreme-risk patients in the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit.

Anaesthesia·2023
Same journal

Single-stapled versus non-single-stapled colorectal anastomosis in minimally invasive anterior resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Techniques in coloproctology·2026
Same journal

When nothing else matters: proctectomy for complex perianal Crohn's disease-indications, timing, techniques, and outcomes.

Techniques in coloproctology·2026
Same journal

Intermuscular dissection by transanal endoscopic operation for a rectal lesion.

Techniques in coloproctology·2026
Same journal

Predicting anatomical difficulty in robot-assisted rectal resection using a novel anatomic landmark-based grading system: a prospective observational study.

Techniques in coloproctology·2026
Same journal

Effect of home biofeedback treatment in patients with fecal incontinence: a pilot study.

Techniques in coloproctology·2026
Same journal

Surgery for anismus.

Techniques in coloproctology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Murine Distal Colostomy, A Novel Model of Diversion Colitis in C57BL/6 Mice
08:20

Murine Distal Colostomy, A Novel Model of Diversion Colitis in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: July 12, 2018

Twenty-three-hour stay loop ileostomy closures: a pilot study.

O Peacock1, A Bhalla, J A Simpson

  • 1Division of Surgery, School of Graduate Entry Medicine and Health, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3DT, UK. oliver.peacock@nhs.net

Techniques in Coloproctology
|September 1, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A 23-hour discharge protocol for loop ileostomy closures is safe and feasible. Enhanced patient support and primary care are key to preventing readmissions after this rapid recovery pathway.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Murine Distal Colostomy, A Novel Model of Diversion Colitis in C57BL/6 Mice
08:20

Murine Distal Colostomy, A Novel Model of Diversion Colitis in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: July 12, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Surgical Outcomes
  • Patient Pathways

Background:

  • Ileostomy closures in the UK involve significant inpatient stays (35,442 bed days for 4,463 procedures in 2010-2011).
  • A median inpatient stay of 5 days for ileostomy closure contrasts with shorter colectomy durations.
  • This study investigates the potential for reduced length of stay in loop ileostomy closures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a 23-hour discharge protocol for loop ileostomy closures.
  • To assess patient outcomes and readmission rates following a rapid discharge pathway.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of a specific patient journey for 23-hour discharge post-loop ileostomy closure.
  • Follow-up via telephone contact (24-48 hours) and routine outpatient appointments.
  • Provision of a 24-hour emergency contact point for patients.

Main Results:

  • Twenty-three patients (18 male, median age 63) were included in the study.
  • Fifteen patients (65%) were discharged within 23 hours; all were discharged within 48 hours.
  • Four patients (17%) were readmitted for wound infection, wound discharge, Clostridium difficile, or an anastomotic leak.

Conclusions:

  • A 23-hour discharge protocol for loop ileostomy closures is demonstrated as feasible and safe.
  • Improved primary care and out-of-hours support could mitigate minor wound complications.
  • The protocol has been adopted as standard care, with enhanced patient information and stoma care support.