Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation01:30

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often blend...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Michael Patrick Sheetz, 1946-2025, a devotee of and major contributor to membrane and cytoskeletal biology.

Molecular biology of the cell·2025
Same author

Kinetic regulation of kinesin's two motor domains coordinates its stepping along microtubules.

eLife·2025
Same author

Mechanical stretch regulates macropinocytosis in <i>Hydra vulgaris</i>.

Molecular biology of the cell·2024
Same author

Bridging gaps in traditional research training with iBiology Courses.

PLoS biology·2024
Same author

De novo protein identification in mammalian sperm using in situ cryoelectron tomography and AlphaFold2 docking.

Cell·2023
Same author

Nucleolar dynamics are determined by the ordered assembly of the ribosome.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023
Same journal

Csf1 facilitates adaptive membrane lipid remodeling linked to ER-plasma membrane contact sites.

Molecular biology of the cell·2026
Same journal

Differential effects of tropomyosin paralogs on mitochondrial dynamics in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>.

Molecular biology of the cell·2026
Same journal

Mutating different α-tubulin acetylation sites has distinct effects on axon terminal morphogenesis in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>.

Molecular biology of the cell·2026
Same journal

Novel KIF22 Variants Disrupt Mitosis in Human Chondrocytes and Expand SEMDJL2 Mechanisms.

Molecular biology of the cell·2026
Same journal

Functions and trafficking mechanisms of RIC-8 in <i>C. elegans</i> and mammalian cilia.

Molecular biology of the cell·2026
Same journal

The <i>C. elegans</i> WASH complex supports epithelial polarity by promoting endosomal sorting of E-Cadherin.

Molecular biology of the cell·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Evaluating how we evaluate.

Ronald D Vale1

  • 1Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. vale@cmp.ucsf.edu

Molecular Biology of the Cell
|September 1, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific career advancement relies on publication metrics, but current evaluation systems are outdated. A richer assessment beyond standard CVs is needed for accurate recognition of scientific contributions.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Academic science
  • Research evaluation
  • Scientific productivity

Background:

  • Traditional evaluation metrics for academic science, like publications, remain largely unchanged despite significant shifts in the scientific landscape.
  • Current systems for grant and promotion evaluations are deeply entrenched and slow to adapt.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine current methods of evaluating scientific productivity.
  • To identify the shortcomings and rewards of existing evaluation processes.
  • To explore the benefits of using comprehensive data beyond standard curriculum vitae/biosketches.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and analysis of current practices in academic science evaluation.
  • Examination of the impact of evaluation processes on scientific training, funding, publication, and culture.

Main Results:

  • Existing evaluation frameworks may not accurately reflect the full scope of scientific and educational contributions.
  • The evaluation process significantly influences scientific training, resource allocation, knowledge dissemination, and the overall culture of science.

Conclusions:

  • Richer evaluation metrics are necessary to provide a more accurate assessment of scientists' contributions.
  • Reforming evaluation processes is crucial for adapting academic science to modern realities and fostering a more equitable scientific enterprise.