Randomised controlled monotherapy trials: which comparators to use?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
1Laboratorio di Malattie Neurologiche, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Istituto Mario Negri, Milano, Italy.
Abstract:
As approximately 50% of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy achieve seizure remission after initial monotherapy, the selection of the first-choice drug to be used as the gold standard in randomised clinical trials is critical. Several first and second generation drugs have been used in regulatory and pragmatic monotherapy trials with similar efficacy but differing pharmacokinetic, tolerability, and safety profiles. None of the available compounds has an ideal profile and second generation drugs do not appear to present unequivocal advantages in this regard. Compared to first generation drugs, some newer generation antiepileptic drugs may be preferred as they have similar efficacy but lower potential for idiosyncratic reactions and drug interactions. However, more recent antiepileptic drugs also have limitations, which include lack of superiority and, in some cases, unbearable adverse effects. In this light, there are no standard criteria as a reference for the selection of the best comparator for new monotherapy trials. However, according to the recommendations of evidence-based guidelines, carbamazepine still represents the first-choice drug for patients with partial epilepsy. Ethosuximide may be an option for absence epilepsy. In contrast, for the treatment of patients with other generalised epilepsies, there is no clear indication of preferred drug, as valproate, which has been found to prevail over other compounds, should be withheld in women of childbearing age due to its teratogenic potential, and there is insufficient evidence to choose an alternative drug.
More Related Videos
08:36The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published on: April 19, 2024
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Blinding
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...