Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of Graft CD3 Lymphocyte Cell Dose on Clinical Outcome of Children Undergoing Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation With Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide.

Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology·2025
Same author

On the Biosynthesis of Bioactive Tryptamines in Black Cohosh (<i>Actaea racemosa</i> L.).

Plants (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Bridging the Gaps: Multidisciplinary and Dental Strategies for Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome Management.

International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry·2024
Same author

NEPHRO-ZEBRA-a neonate with severe jaundice, persistent thrombocytopenia & recurrent acute kidney injury later in childhood: Joining the dots!

Journal of nephrology·2024
Same author

Incidence, Risk Factors, Characteristics, and Outcome of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease in Children Undergoing Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant With Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide.

Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology·2023
Same author

Fatal Severe Cytokine Release Syndrome Post-haploidentical Stem Cell Transplant With Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide in an Infant With Severe Combined Immunodeficiency and Disseminated Bacille Calmette-Guérin Infection.

Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

The Development and Application of Biophysical Assays for Evaluating Ternary Complex Formation Induced by Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACS)
07:22

The Development and Application of Biophysical Assays for Evaluating Ternary Complex Formation Induced by Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACS)

Published on: January 12, 2024

ABRF-MIRG benchmark study: molecular interactions in a three-component system.

Aaron P Yamniuk1, Suzanne C Edavettal, Simon Bergqvist

  • 1Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA. aaron.yamniuk@bms.com

Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT
|September 4, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers assessed how well scientists could characterize complex protein interactions using biosensor technologies. The study focused on determining if multiple proteins bind to a single target or compete for binding, highlighting challenges in analyzing multiprotein complexes.

Keywords:
barnasebarstarbiolayer interferometrybiosensorbivalent barnase variantscompetitionepitope mappingmass spectrometryproteinproteomicssurface plasmon resonanceternary complex

More Related Videos

Real Time Measurements of Membrane Protein:Receptor Interactions Using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)
09:35

Real Time Measurements of Membrane Protein:Receptor Interactions Using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)

Published on: November 29, 2014

A BW Reporter System for Studying Receptor-Ligand Interactions
06:05

A BW Reporter System for Studying Receptor-Ligand Interactions

Published on: January 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

The Development and Application of Biophysical Assays for Evaluating Ternary Complex Formation Induced by Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACS)
07:22

The Development and Application of Biophysical Assays for Evaluating Ternary Complex Formation Induced by Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACS)

Published on: January 12, 2024

Real Time Measurements of Membrane Protein:Receptor Interactions Using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)
09:35

Real Time Measurements of Membrane Protein:Receptor Interactions Using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)

Published on: November 29, 2014

A BW Reporter System for Studying Receptor-Ligand Interactions
06:05

A BW Reporter System for Studying Receptor-Ligand Interactions

Published on: January 7, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Proteomics

Background:

  • High-throughput proteomics identifies numerous protein-protein interactions, revealing the complex protein interactome.
  • Characterizing multiprotein complexes and ligand competition presents a significant analytical challenge.
  • Biosensor technologies, like surface plasmon resonance, are crucial for studying molecular interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark the ability of researchers to characterize ternary complex formation versus competitive binding of ligands to a target protein.
  • To evaluate the interpretation of data generated by biosensor technologies in complex interaction studies.
  • To assess the performance of various biosensor instruments in analyzing multiprotein interactions.

Main Methods:

  • A benchmark study was conducted using three purified proteins (A, B, and C).
  • Participants utilized biosensor technologies, primarily surface plasmon resonance, to analyze molecular interactions.
  • The experimental goal was to differentiate between a ternary complex (A-B-C) and competitive binding of B and C to A.

Main Results:

  • Summarizes the diverse experimental approaches employed by participants.
  • Details the interpretation of data derived from biosensor measurements.
  • Presents the outcomes achieved using different biosensor instruments for interaction analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Highlights the practical challenges in accurately characterizing multiprotein complex assembly.
  • Emphasizes the importance of standardized methods for analyzing competitive protein binding.
  • Underscores the need for robust data interpretation strategies in proteomics research.