Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Microhardness Measurements on Tooth and Alveolar Bone in Rodent Oral Disease Models

Microhardness Measurements on Tooth and Alveolar Bone in Rodent Oral Disease Models

Published on: April 26, 2024

Root coverage in molar teeth: a comparative controlled randomized clinical trial.

Giovanni Zucchelli¹, Matteo Marzadori, Monica Mele

¹Department of Odontostomatology, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy. giovanni.zucchelli@unibo.it

Journal of Clinical Periodontology

|September 5, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Teeth

Teeth

The formation of teeth, also known as odontogenesis, is a complex process that begins in utero, around the sixth week of embryonic development. There are three stages to this process: the bud stage, the cap stage, and the bell stage.
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Long-term stability of periodontal plastic surgery featuring traditional autogenous graft and coronally advanced flap alone.

Periodontology 2000·2026

Same author

Esthetical and patient-reported outcomes after root coverage procedures for multiple gingival recessions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Periodontology 2000·2026

Same author

Time flies when you're having a good time.

The international journal of esthetic dentistry·2026

Same author

How to manage malpositioned implants in the esthetic area.

The international journal of esthetic dentistry·2026

Same author

Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-Cited Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession Treatment: Trends in Flap Design, Biomaterials, and Global Contributions.

Journal of functional biomaterials·2025

Same author

Conservative Mucogingival Management of External Cervical Root Resorption Using Bioceramic Repair Materials: A Case Series.

The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry·2025

The Bilaminar technique (BT) offers superior complete root coverage and increased gingival thickness for molar tooth recession compared to the laterally moved, coronally advanced flap (LMCAF). LMCAF provides a more comfortable post-operative experience.

Area of Science:

Periodontology
Regenerative Dentistry

Background:

Gingival recession, particularly on molar teeth, presents a clinical challenge.
Effective treatment is crucial for preserving tooth structure and aesthetics.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the clinical outcomes of the Bilaminar technique (BT) and laterally moved, coronally advanced flap (LMCAF) for treating single gingival recession on molar teeth.

Main Methods:

Fifty patients with Miller I and II gingival recession on first molars were randomized into two groups (25 per group).
Treatments included BT and LMCAF.
Outcomes assessed included post-operative morbidity (1 week), aesthetic evaluation, and clinical evaluation (1 year).

Main Results:

Both techniques showed no significant difference in recession and PPD reduction.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Microhardness Measurements on Tooth and Alveolar Bone in Rodent Oral Disease Models

Microhardness Measurements on Tooth and Alveolar Bone in Rodent Oral Disease Models

Published on: April 26, 2024

BT demonstrated a statistically significant higher probability of complete root coverage (CRC) and increased gingival thickness.

LMCAF resulted in a greater increase in keratinized tissue.

Patient satisfaction was high in both groups.

LMCAF had a better post-operative course, while BT showed better post-operative sensitivity and root coverage evaluation.

Conclusions:

Both LMCAF and BT are effective for treating gingival recession on molar teeth.
BT achieved superior complete root coverage.
LMCAF offered a more comfortable post-operative recovery.