Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Newborn screening reduces survival disparities in SCID after stem cell transplant: A PIDTC report.

Journal of human immunity·2026
Same author

Donor-Specific Transplant Outcomes from BMTCTN 1702: A Multi-Center Prospective Biological-Assignment Trial.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

Real-world heterogeneity in the prognostic value of pre-transplant flow cytometry measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: CIBMTR analysis.

Haematologica·2026
Same author

TITE-safety: a robust time-to-event safety monitoring approach for clinical trials.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Access and Patient Diversity.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Differential effects of two common GVHD prophylaxis regimens on the gut microbiome: Results from the BMT CTN 1801 study.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

The use of group sequential designs with common competing risks tests.

Brent R Logan1, Mei-Jie Zhang

  • 1Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226-0509, USA. blogan@mcw.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|September 5, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Group sequential designs allow early trial termination. This study shows that common methods for analyzing competing risks data, like Gray's test, also follow independent increments in these designs.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Survival Analysis

Background:

  • Group sequential designs enable early clinical trial termination for efficacy or futility.
  • Standard survival analysis methods often follow an independent increments structure.
  • Competing risks present challenges in survival data analysis, necessitating focus on cumulative incidence functions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate that commonly used tests for comparing cumulative incidence functions in the presence of competing risks adhere to the independent increments structure within a group sequential framework.
  • To validate theoretical findings with simulation studies.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical derivation showing that pointwise comparison and Gray's test for cumulative incidence functions follow an independent increments structure.
  • Simulation study to confirm theoretical results with varying sample sizes.
  • Application to real-world clinical trial data from hematopoietic cell transplantation studies.

Main Results:

  • The study theoretically proves that both pointwise comparison and Gray's test for cumulative incidence functions exhibit the independent increments property in group sequential trials.
  • Simulation results confirm the theoretical findings, even with moderate sample sizes.
  • The methods are illustrated using two clinical trial examples.

Conclusions:

  • The independent increments structure is applicable to commonly used methods for comparing cumulative incidence functions under competing risks in group sequential clinical trials.
  • These findings support the use of group sequential methods for analyzing competing risks data, facilitating efficient trial conduct.
  • The validated methods can be applied to optimize clinical trial designs and analyses in fields like hematopoietic cell transplantation.