Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved in...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview01:03

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview

NMR-active nuclei have energy levels called 'spin states' that are associated with the orientations of their nuclear magnetic moments. In the absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear magnetic moments are randomly oriented, and the spin states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field is applied, the spin states have only 2 + 1 orientations available to them. A proton with = ½ has two available orientations. Similarly, for a quadrupolar nucleus with a nuclear spin value of one, the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perspective on a challenge: Predicting the photochemistry of cyclobutanone.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Perspective: Vibronic Coupling Potentials for Trajectory-Based Excited-State Dynamics.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

Preparing Superposition States to Modify the Spectra and to Achieve Complete Selectivity in Photodissociation Reactions.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

Imaging a light-induced molecular elimination reaction with an X-ray free-electron laser.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Roadmap for Molecular Benchmarks in Nonadiabatic Dynamics.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2025
Same author

Combining Optical Control and Geometrical Optimization for Efficient Control of Competing Molecular Photoinduced Processes Far from the Ground State.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

Quantum wave-packet dynamics in spin-coupled vibronic states.

Mirjam Falge1, Volker Engel, Manfred Lein

  • 1Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie and Röntgen Research Center for Complex Material Systems Campus Nord, Universität Würzburg, Emil-Fischer-Straße 42, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A
|September 6, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Researchers developed a new Hamiltonian to control electron spin states. This method dynamically locks spin states using strong fields, offering potential for advanced quantum control in molecular systems.

More Related Videos

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

Resonance Fluorescence of an InGaAs Quantum Dot in a Planar Cavity Using Orthogonal Excitation and Detection
12:57

Resonance Fluorescence of an InGaAs Quantum Dot in a Planar Cavity Using Orthogonal Excitation and Detection

Published on: October 13, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

Resonance Fluorescence of an InGaAs Quantum Dot in a Planar Cavity Using Orthogonal Excitation and Detection
12:57

Resonance Fluorescence of an InGaAs Quantum Dot in a Planar Cavity Using Orthogonal Excitation and Detection

Published on: October 13, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Quantum mechanics
  • Molecular dynamics
  • Computational chemistry

Background:

  • The Shin-Metiu Hamiltonian describes two-electron systems.
  • Understanding and controlling electron spin dynamics is crucial for quantum technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To construct a new Hamiltonian incorporating effective singlet-triplet couplings.
  • To investigate the laser-free dynamics and spin-locking mechanisms in a two-electron system.

Main Methods:

  • Extended the Shin-Metiu Hamiltonian to include singlet-triplet couplings.
  • Calculated Born-Oppenheimer potentials and couplings.
  • Simulated system dynamics using nuclear wave packets and vibronic wave packets on a 3D grid.

Main Results:

  • Successfully constructed a new Hamiltonian with effective singlet-triplet couplings.
  • Demonstrated dynamic spin-locking by decoupling singlet-triplet transitions via a nonresonant dynamic Stark effect in the adiabatic limit.
  • Observed a similar spin-locking mechanism in vibronic dynamics, but multiphoton ionization limited its effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • The developed Hamiltonian enables dynamic control over electron spin states.
  • The nonresonant dynamic Stark effect provides a viable pathway for spin-locking in the adiabatic limit.
  • Further research is needed to overcome limitations imposed by ionization in complex systems.