Guideline adherence after ST-segment elevation versus non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
Keith A Somma1, Deepak L Bhatt, Gregg C Fonarow
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo St., Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Insights
Adherence to guideline-based medical therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) is high. However, improvements are needed, especially for NSTEMI patients, to optimize cardiac care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Quality Improvement
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- Clinical guidelines advocate for similar medical therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI).
- Patient populations with NSTEMI are generally older and present with more comorbidities than those with STEMI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the adherence to guideline-based medical therapy between patients with STEMI and NSTEMI.
- To identify potential areas for quality improvement in the management of myocardial infarction.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 72,352 patients from the Get with the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease (GWTG-CAD) registry.
- Comparison of performance and quality measures, including medication administration and discharge prescriptions, between NSTEMI and STEMI cohorts.
- Adjustment for confounding variables to determine adjusted odds ratios for medication use.
Main Results:
- Overall adherence to guideline-recommended medications was high for both STEMI and NSTEMI patients.
- STEMI patients were more likely to receive aspirin, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors/ARBs, clopidogrel, and lipid-lowering medications within recommended timeframes and at discharge.
- NSTEMI patients, despite having higher comorbidity rates, showed slightly lower adherence rates for several key therapies.
Conclusions:
- High adherence to guideline-based medical therapy is observed in US hospitals for both STEMI and NSTEMI patients.
- Opportunities for enhancing cardiac care quality exist, particularly for the NSTEMI patient population.
- Continued monitoring and quality improvement initiatives are essential to ensure optimal treatment for all myocardial infarction patients.
Background:
Clinical guidelines recommend similar medical therapy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI).
Methods And Results:
Using the Get with the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease registry (GWTG-CAD), we analyzed data including 72 352 patients (48 966, NSTEMI; 23 386, STEMI) from 237 US sites between May 1, 2006 and March 21, 2010. Performance and quality measures were compared between NSTEMI and STEMI patients. NSTEMI patients were older and had a higher rate of medical comorbidities compared with STEMI patients, including prior coronary artery disease (38.5% versus 24.7%; P<0.0001), heart failure (17.5% versus 6.2%; P<0.0001), hypertension (70.8% versus 59.1%; P<0.0001) and diabetes mellitus (34.9 versus 23.3%; P<0.0001). Adjusting for confounding variables, STEMI patients were more likely to receive aspirin within 24 hours 98.5% versus 97.1% (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-2.02), be discharged on aspirin 98.5% versus 97.3% (AOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.19-1.49), β-blockers 98.2% versus 96.9% (AOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.35-1.63), or lipid-lowering medication for low-density lipoprotein level >100 mg/dL 96.8% versus 91.0% (AOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.61-2.13). STEMI patients were also more likely to receive β-blockers within 24 hours of hospital arrival 93.9% versus 90.8% (AOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.37-1.79) and the following discharge medications: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocking agents 85.3% versus 77.4% (AOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.51-1.75), clopidogrel 85.6% versus 67.0% (AOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 2.23-2.61) or lipid-lowering medications 94.8% versus 88.0% (AOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.56-1.86).
Conclusions:
Among hospitals participating in GWTG-CAD, adherence with guideline-based medical therapy was high for patients with both STEMI and NSTEMI. Yet, there is still room for further improvement, particularly in the care of NSTEMI patients.
More Related Videos
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Myocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
