Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Biventricular Assessment of Cardiac Function and Pressure-Volume Loops by Closed-Chest Catheterization in Mice
Published on: June 15, 2020
Relationship of central and peripheral blood pressure to left ventricular mass in hypertensive patients
Francisco J Pérez-Lahiguera1, Enrique Rodilla, Jose A Costa
1Unidad de Hipertensión y Riesgo Vascular, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital de Sagunto, Sagunto, Valencia, España.
Insights
Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure, not central blood pressure, is more closely related to left ventricular mass in untreated hypertensive individuals. Ambulatory systolic blood pressure showed the strongest correlation with left ventricular mass index.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Left ventricular mass (LVM) is a key indicator of cardiovascular risk.
- Hypertension is a primary driver of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
- Understanding the relationship between different blood pressure measurements and LVM is crucial for risk stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between central and peripheral blood pressure measurements and left ventricular mass.
- To determine which blood pressure monitoring method best correlates with left ventricular mass in never-treated hypertensive patients.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 392 never-treated hypertensive individuals.
- Measurements included office, 24-hour ambulatory, and central blood pressure (applanation tonometry).
- Left ventricular mass was assessed using echocardiography.
Main Results:
- Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure showed a stronger relationship with left ventricular mass than office or central blood pressure.
- Systolic blood pressure consistently demonstrated higher correlations than diastolic blood pressure across all measurement types.
- Left ventricular mass index changes were most significantly influenced by variations in 24-hour systolic blood pressure.
Conclusions:
- In untreated middle-aged hypertensive patients, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure is a superior correlate of left ventricular mass compared to office or central readings.
- Central blood pressure measurement did not improve the identification of patients with left ventricular hypertrophy in this cohort.
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring may offer better insights into hypertensive cardiac remodeling.
Introduction And Objectives:
The purpose of the present study was to assess the relationship of central and peripheral blood pressure to left ventricular mass.
Methods:
Cross-sectional study that included 392 never treated hypertensive individuals. Measurement of office, 24-h ambulatory, and central blood pressure (obtained using applanation tonometry) and determination of left ventricular mass by echocardiography were performed in all patients.
Results:
In a multiple regression analysis, with adjustment for age, gender and metabolic syndrome, 24-h blood pressure was more closely related to ventricular mass than the respective office and central blood pressures. Systolic blood pressures always exhibited a higher correlation than diastolic blood pressures in all 3 determinations. The correlation between left ventricular mass index and 24-h systolic blood pressure was higher than that of office (P<.002) or central systolic blood pressures (P<.002). Changes in 24-h systolic blood pressure caused the greatest variations in left ventricular mass index (P<.001).
Conclusions:
In our population of untreated middle-aged hypertensive patients, left ventricular mass index is more closely related to 24-h ambulatory blood pressure than to office or central blood pressure. Central blood pressure does not enable us to better identify patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology

