Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...

Stereotype Content Model

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Within-person dynamics of attention to race and expression of race bias: a real-time test of the self-regulation of prejudice model.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2025

Same author

Dyadic cannabis use, alcohol use and relationship satisfaction: A daily diary study.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2024

Same author

Complementarity in daily marijuana and alcohol among emerging adults.

Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors·2021

Same author

Anxiety increases sensitivity to errors and negative feedback over time.

Biological psychology·2021

Same author

Social neuroscience is more than the study of the human brain: The legacy of John Cacioppo.

Social neuroscience·2021

Same author

The Role of Social and Ability Belonging in Men's and Women's pSTEM Persistence.

Frontiers in psychology·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Structural face encoding: How task affects the N170's sensitivity to race.

Keith B Senholzi¹, Tiffany A Ito

¹Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0345, USA. keith.senholzi@colorado.edu.

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

|September 8, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Task goals influence how the brain processes racial differences in faces. Attention to race enhances ingroup face processing, while attention to identity boosts outgroup face processing.

Keywords:

ERP N170 face processing race of face structural encoding

More Related Videos

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2012

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Social Psychology
Neuroscience

Background:

The N170 event-related potential (ERP) component is a neural marker for face perception.
Previous research on whether the N170 is sensitive to racial differences in faces has yielded inconsistent findings.
Understanding the factors influencing race-based face processing is crucial for addressing intergroup biases.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how task demands modulate the N170 response to racial ingroup versus outgroup faces in White participants.
To determine if attentional focus on race or identity influences early-stage face processing.
To explore the role of goal states in shaping neural responses to racial cues in faces.

Main Methods:

Utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure neural activity.
Presented White participants with images of White (ingroup) and Black (outgroup) faces.
Manipulated participants' attentional focus by assigning tasks requiring attention to either race or unique facial identity.

Main Results:

N170 amplitudes were larger for ingroup (White) faces when participants attended to race.
N170 amplitudes were larger for outgroup (Black) faces when participants attended to unique identity.
These results indicate that attentional goals can alter the neural processing of racial cues in faces.

Conclusions:

Early-stage face processing, as indexed by the N170, is sensitive to racial group membership.
The impact of race on face perception is not fixed but depends on the participant's current attentional goals.
Task-dependent processing suggests that cognitive resources are allocated differently based on whether the focus is on racial categorization or individual identity.