Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Approaching a paradigm shift: endoscopic ablation of lone atrial fibrillation on the beating heart
Timo Weimar1, Martina Vosseler, Markus Czesla
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Sana Cardiac Surgery Stuttgart GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany. timo.weimar@yahoo.de
Background:
Percutaneous catheter ablation has been the preferred treatment strategy for many patients with symptomatic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). However, incomplete ablation lines and varying success rates remain a problem in certain subgroups. This article evaluates the feasibility and efficacy of endoscopically performed left atrial ablation in patients with lone AF.
Methods:
Epicardial bipolar radiofrequency ablation was performed on the beating heart through a bilateral endoscopic approach in 89 consecutive patients with lone AF. This included isolation of the pulmonary veins using a clamp; isolation of the posterior left atrial wall, including a trigonal line to the aortic noncoronary sinus using a linear ablation device; and resection of the left atrial appendage (LAA). Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected prospectively and included questionnaires and 24-hour Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter.
Results:
Mean follow-up was 12±6 months (range, 4-28 months). No patients were lost to follow-up. Mean duration of AF was 6.4±5.7 years, with 35% paroxysmal AF and 65% persistent or long-standing persistent AF. Mean operation time was 180±43 minutes. There were no deaths, no conversion to sternotomy, and no early or late stroke. Freedom from AF was 88%, 90%, and 90% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Freedom from AF without antiarrhythmic drugs was 71%, 82%, and 90% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively.
Conclusions:
Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation on the beating heart reveals high success rates with low procedure-related morbidity. For improvement of future treatment strategies, a randomized trial is advisable to compare this procedure with catheter ablation in certain patient subgroups.

