Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Measuring the 50% Haemolytic Complement (CH50) Activity of Serum
Published on: March 30, 2010
Compensating for the influence of total serum protein in the Schwartz formula
Marijn M Speeckaert1, Birgitte Wuyts, Veronique Stove
1Department of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Insights
This study developed a new method to estimate pediatric glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using Jaffe-based creatinine measurements, correcting for serum protein bias. This allows for more accurate GFR estimation in children when enzymatic methods are unavailable.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Biomarker Measurement
Background:
- The Schwartz 2009 formula is the standard for pediatric GFR estimation but requires enzymatic creatinine assays.
- Non-enzymatic Jaffe methods are widely used but can be affected by serum protein levels, leading to inaccurate GFR estimates.
- A need exists for a reliable GFR estimation method using Jaffe-based creatinine data, especially in resource-limited settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a modified Jaffe-based equation for estimating pediatric GFR that accounts for serum protein variations.
- To assess the performance of the proposed equation against enzymatic creatinine assays and the Schwartz 2009 formula.
- To enable accurate GFR estimation in children using commonly available Jaffe creatinine methods.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study involving 100 pediatric patients was conducted.
- Serum creatinine was measured using Jaffe (compensated) and enzymatic assays.
- Serum total protein, albumin, urea, uric acid, and total bilirubin were quantified.
- A novel equation was developed to correct for protein-induced bias in Jaffe creatinine measurements.
Main Results:
- Serum creatinine differences between enzymatic and compensated Jaffe methods correlated significantly with total protein concentration (r(2)=0.61, p<0.001).
- The protein-corrected Jaffe method yielded results interchangeable with enzymatic assays (r(2)=0.99, p<0.001).
- The corrected Jaffe-based GFR estimates were also interchangeable with the Schwartz 2009 formula (r(2)=0.99, p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- The alkaline picrate (Jaffe) method can be reliably used for GFR estimation in the Schwartz formula by incorporating a serum protein correction.
- This approach enhances the utility of Jaffe-based creatinine assays for pediatric GFR assessment.
- Accurate pediatric GFR estimation is achievable with Jaffe methods when accounting for protein bias.
Background:
The Schwartz 2009 creatinine-based revised formula is the only pediatric GFR estimating formula, which is compatible with the recent global creatinine standardization. This formula is only applicable if enzymatic creatinine methods are used. We propose an equation, taking into account the relative bias caused by serum proteins to use Jaffe based creatinine data for GFR estimation.
Methods:
In a cohort study of 100 pediatric patients, serum creatinine was measured using a kinetic rate-blanked Jaffe assay (modified kinetic alkaline picrate method), a kinetic rate-blanked Jaffe compensated assay for reactive proteins and an enzymatic assay (creatinine plus method). Serum total protein, albumin, urea, uric acid and total bilirubin were measured with the use of commercial agents.
Results:
The difference in serum creatinine between the enzymatic method and the compensated Jaffe method was mainly dependent on the total protein concentration in serum (r(2)=0.61, p<0.001). After applying the proposed protein correction, corrected compensated Jaffe results and creatinine clearance values became interchangeable with enzymatic serum creatinine results (r(2)=0.99, p<0.001; Deming regression: slope: 0.9787, intercept: -0.351) and with the newly proposed Schwartz formula, respectively (r(2)=0.99, p<0.001; Deming regression: slope 1.004, intercept: 2.16).
Conclusions:
In this study, we demonstrated the usability of the alkaline picrate method in the Schwartz formula, taking into account the relative bias caused by serum proteins.
Related Concept Videos
EDTA: Auxiliary Complexing Reagents
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Serum Creatinine Concentration and Clearance
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management
Serum Studies: Renal Function Tests

