Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

45.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
45.6K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

35.6K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
35.6K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

8.3K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
8.3K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

3.8K
No description available
3.8K
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

14.8K
Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain.  Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
14.8K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

76.9K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
76.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A unified analysis of global riverine eDNA reveals common associations of fish biodiversity with drainage characteristics.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Integrated Reanalysis of Global Riverine Fish eDNA Datasets Shows Robustness and Congruence of Biodiversity Conclusions.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same author

Gonadal development and gene expression in the leopard gecko during temperature-dependent sex determination.

Developmental biology·2026
Same author

Reproducible and Multi-Study Transcriptomic Integration with <i>disint</i>, Disease Integration and Clustering Toolkit, and Application to Drug Repositioning.

Omics : a journal of integrative biology·2026
Same author

Synthesis of Lophine-Modified Magnetite Nano-LEGO Blocks.

ACS omega·2025
Same author

Variations in the <sup>129</sup>I/<sup>127</sup>I ratios of pre-world war II algae under long-term exposure to atmospheric iodine isotopes.

Marine pollution bulletin·2025
Same journal

Adaptive Dynamics of Quantitative Traits in a Steadily Changing Environment.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Functional Landscape of Zebrafish Gonadotropins and Receptors: A Comprehensive Genetic Analysis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Synergistic actions of Nup43 and Myosin VI drive actin cone assembly during Drosophila spermiogenesis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Identification of two Cryptococcus neoformans heme transporters involved in Fhb1-mediated nitrosative stress protection in a fission yeast model.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of a hypomorphic mei-P26 mutation reveals coordination between developmental programming of germ cells and meiotic chromosome dynamics.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Neural and Genetic Mechanisms Regulating Copulation Latency in Male Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.6K

Weak selection and protein evolution.

Hiroshi Akashi1, Naoki Osada, Tomoko Ohta

  • 1Division of Evolutionary Genetics, Department of Population Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan. hakashi@nig.ac.jp

Genetics
|September 12, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The nearly neutral theory explains genome evolution through weak forces like mutation and genetic drift. While influential, its predictions are sensitive to population size and alternative mechanisms can explain observed patterns.

More Related Videos

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity
09:16

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

Published on: March 25, 2020

7.8K
Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli
09:01

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Published on: March 16, 2011

31.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.6K
In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity
09:16

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

Published on: March 25, 2020

7.8K
Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli
09:01

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Published on: March 16, 2011

31.2K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Evolution
  • Population Genetics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • The nearly neutral theory integrates mutation, genetic drift, and weak natural selection to explain genome evolution.
  • It addresses patterns in protein and DNA variation data, adjusting the neutral theory.
  • Weakly selected mutation dynamics are highly sensitive to population size.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Review the motivation and structure of the nearly neutral theory model.
  • Discuss its predictions regarding genome evolution.
  • Evaluate empirical support for weak evolutionary forces in protein evolution.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of the nearly neutral theory.
  • Analysis of evolutionary dynamics of weakly selected mutations.
  • Evaluation of empirical data for protein evolution.

Main Results:

  • Near neutrality may be a common evolutionary mode across diverse mutations and taxa.
  • Multiple mechanisms, including adaptive evolution and linked selection, can explain genome variation patterns.
  • The nearly neutral model exhibits strong parameter sensitivity.

Conclusions:

  • Near neutrality offers a framework for understanding genome evolution but faces challenges from parameter sensitivity.
  • Concave fitness functions are proposed as a basis for weak selection.
  • Distinguishing near neutrality from other evolutionary forces requires careful empirical evaluation.