Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Active and probe-free intracellular rheology via phase-sensitive thermoviscous flows.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Electronic Health Record Alerts to Improve Lipid Lowering After a Recent Myocardial Infarction.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule Ncam1b Promotes Effective Hair Cell Regeneration in Zebrafish Neuromasts.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Immunodeficiency-associated primary CNS lymphomas: an International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group study.

Blood·2026
Same author

Influences on Emergency Clinician Use of Health Information Exchange: Interview Study.

JMIR medical informatics·2025
Same author

Color and fluorescence switchable 2D and 3D printed hybrid materials.

Materials horizons·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Microfabrication of Chip-sized Scaffolds for Three-dimensional Cell cultivation
09:37

Microfabrication of Chip-sized Scaffolds for Three-dimensional Cell cultivation

Published on: May 12, 2008

Micro-engineered 3D scaffolds for cell culture studies.

Alexandra M Greiner1, Benjamin Richter, Martin Bastmeyer

  • 1Department of Cell and Neurobiology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Haid-und-Neu-Strasse 9, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.

Macromolecular Bioscience
|September 12, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Well-defined synthetic 3D scaffolds offer precise control over cellular environments, unlike complex natural polymers. This review evaluates how tailored 3D scaffolds influence cell morphology, differentiation, and behavior.

More Related Videos

Self-reporting Scaffolds for 3-Dimensional Cell Culture
14:49

Self-reporting Scaffolds for 3-Dimensional Cell Culture

Published on: November 7, 2013

Interview: Bioreactors and Surfaced-Modified 3D-Scaffolds for Stem Cell Research
08:06

Interview: Bioreactors and Surfaced-Modified 3D-Scaffolds for Stem Cell Research

Published on: May 21, 2008

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Microfabrication of Chip-sized Scaffolds for Three-dimensional Cell cultivation
09:37

Microfabrication of Chip-sized Scaffolds for Three-dimensional Cell cultivation

Published on: May 12, 2008

Self-reporting Scaffolds for 3-Dimensional Cell Culture
14:49

Self-reporting Scaffolds for 3-Dimensional Cell Culture

Published on: November 7, 2013

Interview: Bioreactors and Surfaced-Modified 3D-Scaffolds for Stem Cell Research
08:06

Interview: Bioreactors and Surfaced-Modified 3D-Scaffolds for Stem Cell Research

Published on: May 21, 2008

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Cell Biology
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • Cells exhibit distinct morphology and differentiation in 3D physiological environments compared to 2D cultures.
  • Naturally derived polymers used for 3D cell studies possess complex, variable compositions and properties.
  • A need exists for well-defined 3D scaffolds to systematically study cellular behavior in controlled environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review fabrication techniques, materials, architectures, and properties of 3D scaffolds.
  • To evaluate the influence of synthetic 3D scaffolds on cell behavior.
  • To focus on computer-based fabrication of tailored scaffolds for single cells and small cell assemblies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of fabrication techniques for synthetic 3D scaffolds.
  • Analysis of materials, architectures, and biochemical functionalizations.
  • Evaluation of mechanical properties of 3D scaffolds.
  • Examination of studies using computer-based fabrication methods.

Main Results:

  • Synthetic 3D scaffolds allow for precise control over scaffold properties.
  • Tailored 3D environments significantly influence cell morphology and differentiation.
  • Computer-based fabrication enables the creation of specific architectures for studying cell assemblies.

Conclusions:

  • Well-defined synthetic 3D scaffolds are crucial for systematic investigation of cell behavior.
  • Computer-based fabrication techniques facilitate the design of advanced 3D cell culture models.
  • Understanding the interplay between scaffold properties and cell responses is key for advancing regenerative medicine and tissue engineering.