Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

11:20
Retinal Pigment Epithelium Transplantation in a Non-human Primate Model for Degenerative Retinal Diseases
Published on: June 14, 2021
Amniotic membrane transplantation for acute ocular burns
Gerry Clare1, Hanif Suleman, Catey Bunce
1Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. msxgc@nottingham.ac.uk.
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|September 14, 2012
Summary
Amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) for acute ocular surface burns shows potential for improved healing and vision in moderate burns, but conclusive evidence is lacking due to study limitations. Further research is needed for severe burns.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Regenerative Medicine
- Trauma Care
Background:
- Ocular surface burns, caused by chemicals or heat, pose significant risks to vision.
- Amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) is a surgical procedure involving applying amniotic membrane (AM) to the ocular surface.
- AMT is proposed to aid healing and reduce complications in acute ocular surface burns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in treating acute ocular surface burns.
- To assess the impact of AMT on epithelialization and visual acuity following burns.
Main Methods:
- A systematic search of multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, mRCT, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP) was conducted.
- Included were randomized controlled trials comparing AMT plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone for ocular surface burns within seven days of injury.
- Data were extracted and analyzed using risk ratios and mean differences, with independent assessment of study bias.
Main Results:
- One randomized controlled trial with 100 participants was included, analyzing a subset of 68 patients with moderate to severe ocular burns.
- In moderate burns, AMT showed a trend towards improved epithelialization (RR 0.18, P=0.09) and significantly better final visual acuity (MD -0.32).
- In severe burns, AMT showed no significant difference in epithelialization (RR 1.01) or final visual acuity (MD 0.13), with high risks of bias identified in the study.
Conclusions:
- Conclusive evidence supporting amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) for acute ocular surface burns is currently insufficient.
- Factors such as disease heterogeneity, treatment variations, and outcome measure inconsistencies complicate definitive conclusions.
- High risks of bias in the included study limit confidence in the findings, necessitating further high-quality research.

