Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
Individual variation in the late positive complex to semantic anomalies
Miriam Kos1, Danielle van den Brink, Peter Hagoort
1Radboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Individual differences significantly impact the Late Positive Complex (LPC) during sentence processing, explaining varied findings in language research. Contextual constraint and working memory did not affect the LPC.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psycholinguistics
- Event-Related Potentials (ERPs)
Background:
- Semantically anomalous words elicit N400 effects in sentence processing.
- The subsequent Late Positive Complex (LPC) following the N400 is inconsistently observed.
- Factors influencing LPC variability remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate factors influencing the Late Positive Complex (LPC) after N400 effects.
- Examine the roles of contextual constraint, working memory, and inter-individual variation.
- Clarify the diversity in LPC findings in language research.
Main Methods:
- Seventy-two participants processed sentences with semantic manipulations.
- Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), including N400 and LPC, were recorded.
- Correlations between LPC amplitude and contextual constraint, working memory, and individual differences were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Neither contextual constraint nor working memory significantly correlated with the LPC.
- Substantial inter-individual variation was observed in LPC elicitation.
- Approximately half of the participants showed a negative response, while the other half exhibited an LPC.
- This variation correlated with a syntactic ERP and an alternative semantic manipulation.
Conclusions:
- Inter-individual variation is a major determinant of LPC elicitation in sentence processing.
- Observed individual differences may explain the inconsistent findings of LPC effects in prior language research.
- Future research should account for participant variability when studying the LPC.
More Related Videos
08:17A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential (ERP) Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published on: April 12, 2018
06:15Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism
Published on: October 3, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Lateralization
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Positive Symptoms of Schizophrenia: Hallucinations and Delusions
Thought Disorders
Disorganized and unusual thought processes mark thought disorders in schizophrenia. One key feature is disorganized speech, where an individual's conversation includes loosely...
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs