Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...

Bonferroni Test

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer: Update from a Randomized Clinical Trial of Limited Versus Extended Dissection.

European urology·2024

Same author

Successful completion of large, low-cost randomized cancer trials at an academic cancer center.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2024

Same author

Testosterone Therapy in Men After Radical Prostatectomy for Low-Intermediate Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer.

The Journal of urology·2024

Same author

Re: Early Prostate Cancer Deaths Among Men with Higher vs Lower Genetic Risk.

European urology·2024

Same author

Transperineal vs Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-The PREVENT Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA oncology·2024

Same author

Clinical utility of an artificial intelligence radiomics-based tool for risk stratification of pulmonary nodules.

JNCI cancer spectrum·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

A simple decision analytic solution to the comparison of two binary diagnostic tests.

Andrew J Vickers¹, Angel M Cronin, Mithat Gönen

¹Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA. vickersa@mskcc.org

Statistics in Medicine

|September 15, 2012

Summary

Comparing diagnostic tests involves balancing sensitivity and specificity. This study introduces a decision analytic method using a threshold probability to objectively select the optimal test for better clinical outcomes.

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Decision Analysis
Medical Diagnostics

Background:

Comparing binary diagnostic tests often involves trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity.
Choosing the optimal test typically requires subjective judgment regarding the balance of these metrics.
Existing methods may not provide a clear framework for decision-making when sensitivity and specificity differ.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a quantitative decision analytic solution for comparing two binary diagnostic tests.
To introduce a method for objectively selecting the superior test based on clinical utility.
To develop a framework that incorporates patient treatment decisions influenced by disease probability.

Main Methods:

Developed a decision analytic model weighting sensitivity and specificity by a threshold probability of disease.
Derived a formula for relative diagnostic value (RDV) as the ratio of differences in sensitivities and specificities.
Utilized RDV and disease prevalence to determine the threshold probability for test selection.

Main Results:

The proposed method provides a net benefit score to compare diagnostic tests at a given threshold probability.
A simple formula for relative diagnostic value was derived and validated.
The study demonstrates how to identify the threshold probability below which a more sensitive test is preferred and above which a more specific test is preferred.

Conclusions:

The decision analytic approach offers an objective method for choosing between diagnostic tests with differing sensitivity and specificity.
The derived methodology provides a clear decision rule based on the threshold probability of disease.
The framework is adaptable for complex scenarios, including combinations of tests and risk assessments.