Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Magnetic Adjustment of Afterload in Engineered Heart Tissues
Published on: May 5, 2020
Relation of left ventricular hemodynamic load and contractile performance to left ventricular mass in hypertension
A Ganau1, R B Devereux, T G Pickering
1Cardiovascular and Hypertension Center, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, NY 10021.
Insights
Left ventricular mass in hypertension is influenced by chamber size and contractility, not just blood pressure. This study shows hypertrophy aligns with hemodynamic load, with chamber volume being a key factor.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Physiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Systolic blood pressure's weak correlation with left ventricular mass suggests non-hemodynamic factors influence cardiac muscle growth in hypertension.
- Understanding the role of left ventricular chamber size, hemodynamic load, and myocardial contractility is crucial for explaining hypertrophy development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that left ventricular chamber size, reflecting hemodynamic volume load and contractility, influences left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension.
- To investigate the relationship between left ventricular mass and chamber volume, pressure, load, and contractility in hypertensive patients.
Main Methods:
- Utilized M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiograms in 50 normal subjects and 50 untreated essential hypertensive patients.
- Assessed left ventricular load using total load and peak meridional force indices.
- Calculated theoretically optimal left ventricular mass based on systolic blood pressure and end-diastolic diameter.
Main Results:
- Left ventricular mass correlated better with end-diastolic volume (r=0.56) and total load/peak meridional force (r=0.68-0.70) than with systolic blood pressure (r=0.45).
- Multivariate analysis revealed end-diastolic volume and blood pressure as independent predictors of left ventricular mass (R=0.75).
- Actual and theoretically optimal left ventricular mass were closely related (r=0.76), indicating hypertrophy paralleled hemodynamic load.
Conclusions:
- Left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension is significantly influenced by chamber size and hemodynamic load, not solely by blood pressure.
- Chamber volume, stroke index, and contractility are key determinants of left ventricular mass, collectively explaining a substantial portion of its variability.
- The findings challenge the interpretation of a weak blood pressure-mass relation as solely non-hemodynamic, highlighting the importance of chamber dimensions.
Abstract:
The weak relation of systolic blood pressure to left ventricular mass in hypertensive patients is often interpreted as evidence of nonhemodynamic stimuli to muscle growth. To test the hypothesis that left ventricular chamber size, reflecting hemodynamic volume load and myocardial contractility, influences the development of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension, we studied actual and theoretic relations of left ventricular mass to left ventricular diastolic chamber volume, pressure and volume load, and an index of contractility. Data were obtained from independently measured M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiograms in 50 normal subjects and 50 untreated patients with essential hypertension. Two indices of overall left ventricular load were assessed: total load (systolic blood pressure x left ventricular endocardial surface area) and peak meridional force (systolic blood pressure x left ventricular cross sectional area). A theoretically optimal left ventricular mass, allowing each subject to achieve mean normal peak stress, was calculated as a function of systolic blood pressure and M-mode left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. Left ventricular mass measured by M-mode echo correlated better with two-dimensional echocardiogram derived left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r = 0.56, p less than 0.001) than with systolic blood pressure (r = 0.45, p less than 0.001) and best with total load or peak meridional force (r = 0.68 and 0.70, p less than 0.001). In multivariate analysis both end-diastolic volume and blood pressure were independent predictors of systolic mass (p less than 0.001) and explained most of its variability (R = 0.75, p less than 0.001). Theoretically optimal left ventricular mass was more closely related to end-diastolic volume (r = 0.72, p less than 0.001) than to systolic blood pressure (r = 0.46, p less than 0.001); thus, the relatively weak correlation between blood pressure and optimal mass reflected the influence of left ventricular cavity size, rather than a lack of proportionality between load and hypertrophy. Actual and theoretically optimal left ventricular mass were closely related (r = 0.76, p less than 0.001), indicating that left ventricular hypertrophy in most cases paralleled hemodynamic load. Left ventricular mass was positively related to stroke index and inversely to contractility (as estimated by the end-systolic stress/volume index ratio), the main determinants of left ventricular chamber volume. In multivariate analysis, systolic blood pressure, stroke index, and the end-systolic stress/volume index ratio were each independently related to left ventricular mass index (all p less than 0.001, multiple R = 0.81) and accounted for 66% of its overall variability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send blood...
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

