Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Identification of Rare Bacterial Pathogens by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS
Published on: July 11, 2016
Evaluation of four pretreatment procedures for MALDI-TOF MS yeast identification in the routine clinical laboratory
Carole Cassagne1, Anne-Laure Cella, Pierre Suchon
1Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU Timone, Université de la Méditerranée, F-13385 Marseille, France. carole.cassagne@ap-hm.fr
Abstract:
MALDI-TOF MS-based yeast identification requires a pretreatment step for which four are described in the literature, i.e., direct smear, fast formic acid and two complete formic acid/acetonitrile extractions. In this study we compared the impact of these procedures on the performance of MALDI-TOF MS-based yeast identification of samples from colonies grown on Sabouraud or chromogenic media. A total of 103 yeast isolates recovered from clinical samples were identified in parallel using the four pretreatment procedures. The proportions of both correct identifications (regardless of LogScore values) and of reliable identifications (i.e., correct identifications with a LogScore 2, as recommended by the manufacturer) obtained with the four techniques were compared. Even if the proportion of correct identifications exceeded 85% independent of the pretreatment procedure, results obtained with complete formic acid/acetonitril extractions of colonies grown on Sabouraud media were significantly superior to those with smear and fast formic acid extraction procedures. If one considers only reliable identifications, then both smear and fast formic acid extraction procedures yielded lower (<40%) correct identification rates than the use of the two complete extraction procedures (>77%) of portions of colonies on both Sabouraud and chromogenic media. The data would indicate that the direct smear and fast formic acid procedures cannot be recommended due to the LogScore values which were continually below those recommended by the manufacturer for biological validation. Thus, complete extraction methods are better suited for MALDI-TOF MS-based yeast identification in the clinical laboratory setting although they are more labor-intensive.
Insights
Complete formic acid/acetonitrile extraction methods significantly improve Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time Of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) yeast identification accuracy in clinical labs. Simpler methods like direct smear or fast formic acid extraction yield unreliable results.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Analytical Chemistry
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time Of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is crucial for yeast identification.
- Standardized pretreatment protocols are essential for reliable MALDI-TOF MS results.
- Existing literature describes four main pretreatment methods: direct smear, fast formic acid, and two complete formic acid/acetonitrile extractions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the impact of four different yeast pretreatment methods on MALDI-TOF MS identification performance.
- To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of yeast identification using colonies grown on Sabouraud or chromogenic media.
- To determine the optimal pretreatment procedure for clinical laboratory settings.
Main Methods:
- Compared four pretreatment procedures (direct smear, fast formic acid, two complete formic acid/acetonitrile extractions) for MALDI-TOF MS yeast identification.
- Utilized 103 yeast isolates from clinical samples.
- Assessed correct identification rates (with and without LogScore cutoff) and reliable identification rates (LogScore ≥ 2).
Main Results:
- All methods achieved >85% correct yeast identification, irrespective of LogScore.
- Complete formic acid/acetonitrile extractions yielded significantly superior results compared to smear and fast formic acid methods on Sabouraud media.
- Reliable identification rates were <40% for smear and fast formic acid, versus >77% for complete extraction methods on both media types.
Conclusions:
- Direct smear and fast formic acid pretreatment methods are not recommended for clinical MALDI-TOF MS yeast identification due to consistently low LogScore values.
- Complete formic acid/acetonitrile extraction procedures offer superior accuracy and reliability for MALDI-TOF MS-based yeast identification.
- Despite being more labor-intensive, complete extraction methods are better suited for clinical laboratory applications.
Related Concept Videos
MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry
Automated Microbial Diagnostics

