General practitioners' views on quality markers for children in UK primary care: a qualitative study

Peter J Gill1, Jenny Hislop, David Mant

  • 1Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, UK. peter.gill@phc.ox.ac.uk

BMC Family Practice
|September 18, 2012
PubMed

Insights

General practitioners (GPs) in the UK support developing quality markers for child healthcare. However, challenges remain in creating measurable, targeted standards within primary care control.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Primary Care
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • General Practice Research

Background:

  • Children constitute 20% of the UK population, yet their healthcare is underrepresented in the UK Quality Outcomes Framework.
  • Less than 3% of current quality markers pertain to pediatric care, highlighting a significant gap.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate general practitioners' (GPs) views on introducing child-specific quality markers in UK primary care.
  • To explore potential areas and challenges for developing quality indicators in pediatric general practice.

Main Methods:

  • A qualitative interview study was conducted with 20 GPs across four primary care trusts in Thames Valley, England.
  • Semi-structured interviews explored GPs' perspectives on quality markers and relevant childhood conditions.
  • Thematic analysis using a constant comparative method was employed for data interpretation.

Main Results:

  • All interviewed GPs supported the creation of benchmarks to enhance child healthcare quality.
  • No consensus emerged on specific clinical conditions for quality markers; concerns about unmet needs and proactive care were raised.
  • GPs expressed powerlessness regarding outcomes outside their control (e.g., emergency visits) and emphasized the importance of access to timely appointments and specialist support.

Conclusions:

  • GPs are in favor of developing quality markers for pediatric care in UK general practice.
  • Key challenges include ensuring markers are measurable, targeted, and within primary care's direct influence.
  • Improving access to primary and secondary care appointments may serve as a crucial benchmark for healthcare commissioners.
Abstract