Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
Does increased aortic stiffness predict reduced coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with suspected coronary
A Nemes1, M Csanády, T Forster
1University of Szeged 2nd Department of Medicine and Cardiology Center, Medical Faculty, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, Szeged, Hungary. nemes.attila@med.u-szeged.hu
Insights
Increased aortic stiffness, measured by echocardiography, predicts reduced coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). This finding highlights aortic stiffness as a key indicator for potential cardiac issues.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Reduced coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) is linked to increased aortic stiffness.
- Stress transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) allows simultaneous assessment of CFR and aortic stiffness.
- Aortic stiffness is an emerging cardiovascular risk factor.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if echocardiography-derived aortic elastic modulus [E(p)] predicts impaired CFR.
- To assess the relationship between aortic stiffness and coronary artery disease (CAD) severity.
- To determine the predictive value of aortic stiffness for reduced CFR in patients with suspected CAD.
Main Methods:
- 158 patients with suspected CAD underwent stress TEE.
- Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) was measured.
- Aortic stiffness was assessed using echocardiography-derived aortic elastic modulus [E(p)].
- Aortic atherosclerosis (AA) grade was also evaluated.
Main Results:
- Subjects with CFR < 2 exhibited increased aortic atherosclerosis (AA) grade and higher E(p).
- Logistic regression identified higher AA grade and increased E(p) as independent predictors of reduced CFR.
- The cut-off value for E(p) to predict impaired CFR was ≥ 670 mmHg (61% sensitivity, 61% specificity).
Conclusions:
- Increased aortic stiffness, specifically elevated E(p), independently predicts impaired CFR in patients with suspected CAD.
- Aortic stiffness parameters are valuable in assessing cardiovascular risk in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
- Stress TEE provides a comprehensive evaluation of both coronary and aortic function.
Purpose:
In recent studies, reduction in coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) has been demonstrated in patients with increased aortic stiffness. Stress transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a suitable method for the simultaneous evaluation of CFR and aortic stiffness parameters. The present study was designed to test whether increased echocardiography-derived aortic elastic modulus [E(p)] predicts impaired CFR in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
Results:
The present study comprised 158 patients with suspected CAD. A CFR value < 2 was considered abnormal. Both men grade of aortic atherosclerosis (AA) (as a morphologic characteristic) (1.31 ± 0.68 vs. 1.02 ± 0.89, p < 0.05) and aortic distensibility (E(p) as a functional characteristic) (892 ± 594 mmHg vs. 723 ± 495 mmHg, P < 0.05) were increased in subjects with CFR < 2. In ROC analysis, the cut-off value for E(p) to predict impaired CFR was ≥ 670 mmHg, with 61% sensitivity and 61% specificity (ROC area 0.60, p = 0.026). The logistic regression model identified higher AA grade (hazard ratio (HR) 2.01, p < 0.05) and increased E(p) as independent predictors of reduced CFR (HE 1.10, p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Increased aortic stiffness predicts impaired CFR in patients with suspected CAD.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management

