Conjugate eye deviation in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: stroke acute management with urgent risk-factor assessment

Shoichiro Sato1, Masatoshi Koga, Hiroshi Yamagami

  • 1Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishirodai, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan. sato.shoichiro.hp@mail.ncvc.go.jp

Stroke
|September 18, 2012
PubMed

Insights

Persistent conjugate eye deviation (CED) in acute stroke patients predicts poor outcomes. Factors like lesion location and hematoma volume influence CED, which is a significant predictor of death or dependency after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Neurosurgery
  • Stroke Medicine

Background:

  • Conjugate eye deviation (CED) is a common finding in acute stroke patients.
  • Understanding factors associated with CED and its prognostic value in acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify factors correlating with CED in acute supratentorial ICH.
  • To determine the relationship between CED and patient outcomes at 3 months post-stroke.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, multicenter study included 211 patients with acute supratentorial ICH.
  • CED was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) best gaze subscore.
  • Hematoma location, volume, and intraventricular extension were evaluated via CT scans.

Main Results:

  • 45% of patients exhibited CED.
  • Independent predictors of CED included right-sided lesions, larger hematoma volume, and lower baseline Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores.
  • Persistent CED (at admission and 72 hours) independently predicted death or dependency at 3 months (OR, 5.77).
  • Optimal hematoma volume cutoffs for CED were ≥13.5 mL for putaminal and ≥7.7 mL for thalamic hemorrhages.

Conclusions:

  • Persistent CED is a significant predictor of poor outcomes in acute supratentorial ICH, independent of initial severity and hematoma volume.
  • Thalamic hemorrhages may require smaller volumes to evoke CED compared to putaminal hemorrhages.
Abstract