Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026
06:11
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
Published on: February 20, 2019
Context explains divergent effects of anger on risk taking
1Department of Psychology, NortheasternUniversity, Boston, MA 02115, USA. joliebaumann@gmail.com
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
|September 19, 2012
Summary
Anger influences risk-taking differently based on context. It increases risk when decisions rely on reasoning but decreases risk when decisions depend on feelings.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Decision Making
Background:
- Anger is commonly linked to increased risk-taking behavior.
- However, anger also heightens the perception of negative event likelihood, complicating this association.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how the context of risk-taking influences decisions influenced by anger.
- To determine if anger's effect on risk depends on whether affective feelings or deliberate reasoning are salient.
Main Methods:
- Participants completed a risk-taking task, with versions designed to elicit either affective or reasoning-based decisions.
- Emotional states were manipulated to induce anger or a neutral state.
Main Results:
- Angry participants took greater risks when decisions were reasoning-based.
- Conversely, angry participants took fewer risks when decisions were affect-based.
- This indicates anger's impact on risk is context-dependent.
Conclusions:
- The assumption that anger universally increases risk-taking is an oversimplification.
- Emotional states are multifaceted, and their impact on decision-making is context-dependent.
- Future research should consider the interplay between emotion, context, and decision components.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Related Concept Videos
01:47Aggression
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for hire...
01:29The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Cognition plays a pivotal role in shaping emotional experiences, as demonstrated by Schachter and Singer’s two-factor theory of emotion. According to this model, emotion arises from a combination of physiological arousal and cognitive interpretation. The body’s physiological response to stimuli is ambiguous and only gains emotional significance through cognitive labeling. For instance, an increased heart rate and adrenaline surge while standing near an attractive person may be interpreted as...
01:23Optimal Arousal Theory
The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
01:25Self-Regulation
Self-regulation, also known as self-control, encompasses a range of cognitive and behavioral processes that allow individuals to adjust their internal states and outward actions to align with socially acceptable norms and long-term goals. It plays a fundamental role in adaptive functioning, from resisting impulsive behaviors to persisting through challenging tasks. While its benefits are widely recognized, self-regulation is not limitless. Muraven and Baumeister's theory posits that...
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
03:26Framing Effects
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...