Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Osmoregulation in Fishes02:32

Osmoregulation in Fishes

When cells are placed in a hypotonic (low-salt) fluid, they can swell and burst. Meanwhile, cells in a hypertonic solution—with a higher salt concentration—can shrivel and die. How do fish cells avoid these gruesome fates in hypotonic freshwater or hypertonic seawater environments?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence of sound production in wild stingrays.

Ecology·2022
Same author

Anatomy of the mechanosensory lateral line canal system and electrosensory ampullae of Lorenzini in two species of sawshark (fam. Pristiophoridae).

Journal of fish biology·2020
Same author

Genetic and historical evidence of common sawsharks Pristiophorus cirratus in the waters of southern Queensland.

Journal of fish biology·2019
Same author

Electroreceptive and mechanoreceptive anatomical specialisations in the epaulette shark (Hemiscyllium ocellatum).

PloS one·2012
Same author

Electric field detection in sawfish and shovelnose rays.

PloS one·2012
Same author

The function of the sawfish's saw.

Current biology : CB·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Long-term Behavioral Tracking of Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish
10:56

Long-term Behavioral Tracking of Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish

Published on: March 6, 2014

Electroreception in elasmobranchs: sawfish as a case study.

Barbara E Wueringer1

  • 1The University of Western Australia, School of Animal Biology, Crawley, Australia.

Brain, Behavior and Evolution
|September 19, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Elasmobranchs use ampullae of Lorenzini for electroreception. Pore distribution varies between species like sawfish and shovelnose rays, reflecting ecological adaptations for prey capture.

Area of Science:

  • Marine Biology
  • Sensory Physiology
  • Comparative Anatomy

Background:

  • Ampullae of Lorenzini are specialized electroreceptors in elasmobranchs, crucial for functions like prey detection.
  • These receptors are organized into pore fields on the skin, with density influenced by species-specific ecology.
  • Previous research highlights electroreception's role in prey localization, but pore distribution variations require further study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare ampullary pore counts within specific pore fields of rhinobatids (shovelnose rays) and pristids (sawfish).
  • To investigate how ecological factors and feeding strategies influence the distribution and density of electroreceptors.
  • To understand the adaptive significance of varying electroreceptor arrangements in different elasmobranch species.

Main Methods:

More Related Videos

Extracellular Multi-Unit Recording from the Olfactory Nerve of Teleosts
07:02

Extracellular Multi-Unit Recording from the Olfactory Nerve of Teleosts

Published on: October 6, 2020

The Identification of Sea Lamprey Pheromones Using Bioassay-Guided Fractionation
09:35

The Identification of Sea Lamprey Pheromones Using Bioassay-Guided Fractionation

Published on: July 17, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Long-term Behavioral Tracking of Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish
10:56

Long-term Behavioral Tracking of Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish

Published on: March 6, 2014

Extracellular Multi-Unit Recording from the Olfactory Nerve of Teleosts
07:02

Extracellular Multi-Unit Recording from the Olfactory Nerve of Teleosts

Published on: October 6, 2020

The Identification of Sea Lamprey Pheromones Using Bioassay-Guided Fractionation
09:35

The Identification of Sea Lamprey Pheromones Using Bioassay-Guided Fractionation

Published on: July 17, 2018

  • Comparative analysis of ampullary pore counts across distinct pore fields in rhinobatids and pristids.
  • Examination of pore distribution on the rostrum, ventral surfaces, and other relevant body areas.
  • Correlation of pore density patterns with known feeding behaviors and ecological niches of the studied species.

Main Results:

  • Similar ventral rostrum pore counts were observed in both shovelnose rays and sawfish.
  • Pristids exhibit increased ampullary pore numbers on the dorsal rostrum, potentially aiding in detecting free-swimming prey.
  • Shovelnose rays show high pore density ventrally around the mouth and gill areas, supporting substrate-based feeding.

Conclusions:

  • Ampullary pore distribution is a key adaptation reflecting elasmobranch feeding strategies and ecological roles.
  • Rhinobatids and pristids display distinct patterns of electroreceptor allocation, optimizing sensory input for their respective environments.
  • This study underscores the intricate relationship between sensory system morphology and behavioral ecology in marine predators.